Web services are rapidly changing the landscape of software engineering. One of the most interesting challenges introduced by web services is represented by Quality Of Service (QoS)-aware composition and late-binding. This allows to bind, at run-time, a service-oriented system with a set of services that, among those providing the required features, meet some non-functional constraints, and optimize criteria such as the overall cost or response time. In other words, QoS-aware composition can be modeled as an optimization problem.We propose to adopt Genetic Algorithms to this aim. Genetic Algorithms, while being slower than integer programming, represent a more scalable choice, and are more suitable to handle generic QoS attributes. The paper describes our approach and its applicability, advantages and weaknesses, discussing results of some numerical simulations.

App Stores, such as Google Play or the Apple Store, allow users to provide feedback on apps by posting review comments and giving star ratings. These platforms constitute a useful electronic mean in which application developers and users can productively exchange information about apps. Previous research showed that users feedback contains usage scenarios, bug reports and feature requests, that can help app developers to accomplish software maintenance and evolution tasks. However, in the case of the most popular apps, the large amount of received feedback, its unstructured nature and varying quality can make the identification of useful user feedback a very challenging task. In this paper we present a taxonomy to classify app reviews into categories relevant to software maintenance and evolution, as well as an approach that merges three techniques: (1) Natural Language Processing, (2) Text Analysis and (3) Sentiment Analysis to automatically classify app reviews into the proposed categories. We show that the combined use of these techniques allows to achieve better results (a precision of 75% and a recall of 74%) than results obtained using each technique individually (precision of 70% and a recall of 67%).Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-113425 Accepted Version Originally published at: Panichella, Sebastiano; Di Sorbo, Andrea; Guzman, Emitza; Visaggio, Corrado Aaron; Canfora, Gerardo; Gall, Harald (2015). How can I improve my app? Classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution. In: ICSME 2015. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, Bremen, 29 September 2015 -1 October 2015.How Can I Improve My App? Classifying User Reviews for Software Maintenance and Evolution S. Panichella * , A. Di Sorbo † , E. Guzman ‡ , C. A.Visaggio † , G. Canfora † and H. C. Gall * * University of Zurich, Switzerland † University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy ‡ Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany panichella@ifi.uzh.ch, disorbo@unisannio.it, emitza.guzman@mytum.de, {visaggio,canfora}@unisannio.it, gall@ifi.uzh.ch Abstract-App Stores, such as Google Play or the Apple Store, allow users to provide feedback on apps by posting review comments and giving star ratings. These platforms constitute a useful electronic mean in which application developers and users can productively exchange information about apps. Previous research showed that users feedback contains usage scenarios, bug reports and feature requests, that can help app developers to accomplish software maintenance and evolution tasks. However, in the case of the most popular apps, the large amount of received feedback, its unstructured nature and varying quality can make the identification of useful user feedback a very challenging task. In this paper we present a taxonomy to classify app reviews into categories relevant to software maintenance and evolution, as well as an approach that merges three techniques: (1) Natural Language Process...

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract