For patients with recurrences of GBM within previously irradiated volumes, CT-guided interstitial HDR-BRT is a feasible treatment option that can play an important role in providing palliation.

ObjectivesTumour recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) after initial treatment with surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy is an inevitable phenomenon. This retrospective cohort study compared the efficacy of interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BRT), re-resection and sole dose dense temozolomide chemotherapy (ddTMZ) in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma after initial surgery and radiochemotherapy.DesignRetropective cohort study.SettingPrimary level of care with two participating centres. The geographical location was central Germany.ParticipantsFrom January 2005 to December 2010, a total of 111 patients developed recurrent GBM after initial surgery and radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) histology-proven diagnosis of primary GBM (WHO grade 4), (2) primary treatment with resection and radiochemotherapy, and (3) tumour recurrence/progression.InterventionsThis study compared retrospectively the efficacy of interstitial HDR-BRT, re-resection and ddTMZ alone in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.Primary and secondary outcome measuresMedian survival, progression free survival and complication rate.ResultsMedian survival after salvage therapy of the recurrence was 37, 30 and 26 weeks, respectively. The HDR-BRT group did significantly better than both the reoperation (p<0.05) and the ddTMZ groups (p<0.05). Moderate to severe complications in the HDR-BRT, reoperation and sole chemotherapy groups occurred in 5/50 (10%), 4/36 (11%) and 9/25 (36%) cases, respectively.ConclusionsCT-guided interstitial HDR-BRT attained higher survival benefits in the management of recurrent glioblastoma after initial surgery and radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide in comparison with the other treatment modalities. The low risk of complications of the HDR-BRT and the fact that it can be delivered percutaneously in local anaesthesia render it a promissing treatment option for selected patients which should be further evaluated.

This paper describes the technique and preliminary results of high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent grade III and grade IV gliomas. Although in the initial treatment of malignant gliomas brachytherapy has been shown to give better results than external beam therapy, this has previously always been with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Stereotactic frames are used for interstitial LDR brachytherapy but a CT image-guided technique does not require such a frame. The survival rates for our initial 53 patients do not significantly differ from LDR results. However, using HDR there are several advantages, including a much shorter treatment time with HDR than LDR and better patient comfort. HDR also allows better individualized optimization of the treatment than LDR.

Glioblastoma multiforme patients presenting with recurrence following multimodality therapy have limited palliative treatment options when the major modalities of therapy including surgery, radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have been exhausted. The authors introduce a clinical and radiological indication-solving algorithm and provide outcome rates of a glioblastoma recurrence cohort. Sixty six consecutive adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent a combined scheme of salvage treatments consisting of reoperation, high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and chemotherapy were included in this prospective study and were compared to a historical control group of 24 recurrent glioblastoma patients who have been treated with intensive temozolomide chemotherapy as the only treatment modality. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 28-36 months). Median survival was 9 months for the entire cohort after salvage treatment and can be translated into a 3-month improvement in survival compared to the control group of patients with glioblastoma recurrence treated with temozolomide alone (P = 0.043). Toxicity and adverse events of reoperation, HDR brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy were quite favourable compared to intensive temomozolomide chemotherapy as the only treatment. Our experience suggests that a combined salvage treatment plan appears to be both feasible and effective and can be considered in selected patients affected by recurrent high grade gliomas. The authors' clinical and radiological indication-solving algorithm may assist in providing the best possible salvage treatment for this difficult population.