<p>Plant traits – the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants – determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystems properties and derived benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the essential basis for a vast area of research spanning evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management and restoration, biogeography to earth system modeling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community. Increasingly the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait-based research, including identi:cation of data gaps and subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we take stock of trait data compiled in TRY and analyze emerging patterns of data coverage, representativeness, and gaps. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits (stable within species) relevant to determine plant functional types commonly used in global vegetation models. For the trait ‘plant growth form’ complete species coverage is within reach. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modeling are characterized by intraspecific variation and trait-environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment: completeness at global scale is impossible and representativeness challenging. Due to the sheer amount of data in the TRY database, machine learning for trait prediction is promising - but does not add new data. We therefore conclude that reducing data gaps and biases by further and more systematic mobilization of trait data and new in-situ trait measurements must continue to be a high priority. This can only be achieved by a community effort in collaboration with other initiatives.</p>

Our ability to understand and predict the response of ecosystems to a changing environment depends on quantifying vegetation functional diversity. However, representing this diversity at the global scale is challenging. Typically, in Earth system models, characterization of plant diversity has been limited to grouping related species into plant functional types (PFTs), with all trait variation in a PFT collapsed into a single mean value that is applied globally. Using the largest global plant trait database and state of the art Bayesian modeling, we created fine-grained global maps of plant trait distributions that can be applied to Earth system models. Focusing on a set of plant traits closely coupled to photosynthesis and foliar respiration-specific leaf area (SLA) and dry mass-based concentrations of leaf nitrogen (Nm) and phosphorus (Pm), we characterize how traits vary within and among over 50,000 ∼50 × 50-km cells across the entire vegetated land surface. We do this in several ways-without defining the PFT of each grid cell and using 4 or 14 PFTs; each model's predictions are evaluated against out-of-sample data. This endeavor advances prior trait mapping by generating global maps that preserve variability across scales by using modern Bayesian spatial statistical modeling in combination with a database over three times larger than that in previous analyses. Our maps reveal that the most diverse grid cells possess trait variability close to the range of global PFT means.odeling global climate and the carbon cycle with Earth system models (ESMs) requires maps of plant traits that play key roles in leaf-and ecosystem-level metabolic processes (1-4). Multiple traits are critical to both photosynthesis and respiration, foremost leaf nitrogen concentration (Nm ) and specific leaf area (SLA) (5-7). More recently, variation in leaf phosphorus concentration (Pm ) has also been linked to variation in photosynthesis and foliar respiration (7-12). Estimating detailed global geographic patterns of these traits and corresponding trait-environment relationships has been hampered by limited measurements (13), but recent improvements in data coverage (14) allow for greater detail in spatial estimates of these key traits.Previous work has extrapolated trait measurements across continental or larger regions through three methodologies: (i) grouping measurements of individuals into larger categories that share a set of properties [a working definition of plant functional types (PFTs)] (4, 15), (ii) exploiting trait-environment relationships (e.g., leaf Nm and mean annual temperature) (1,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), or (iii) restricting the analysis to species whose presence has been widely estimated on the ground (21-24). Each of these methods has limitations-for example, trait-environment relationships do not well explain observed trait spatial patterns (1, 25), while species-based approaches limit the scope of extrapolation to only areas with well-measured species abundance. More critically, the first two global methodologies emp...

Summary We lack strong empirical evidence for links between plant attributes (plant community attributes and functional traits) and the distribution of soil microbial communities at large spatial scales. Using datasets from two contrasting regions and ecosystem types in Australia and England, we report that aboveground plant community attributes, such as diversity (species richness) and cover, and functional traits can predict a unique portion of the variation in the diversity (number of phylotypes) and community composition of soil bacteria and fungi that cannot be explained by soil abiotic properties and climate. We further identify the relative importance and evaluate the potential direct and indirect effects of climate, soil properties and plant attributes in regulating the diversity and community composition of soil microbial communities. Finally, we deliver a list of examples of common taxa from Australia and England that are strongly related to specific plant traits, such as specific leaf area index, leaf nitrogen and nitrogen fixation. Together, our work provides new evidence that plant attributes, especially plant functional traits, can predict the distribution of soil microbial communities at the regional scale and across two hemispheres.

A large body of research shows that biodiversity loss can reduce ecosystem functioning, thus providing support for the conservation of biological diversity [1][2][3][4] . Much of the evidence for this relationship is drawn from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments (hereafter: biodiversity experiments), in which biodiversity loss is simulated by randomly assembling communities of varying species diversity, and ecosystem functions are measured [5][6][7][8][9] . This random assembly has led some ecologists to question the relevance of biodiversity experiments to real-world ecosystems, where community assembly may often be non-random and influenced by external drivers, such as climate or land-use intensification [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . Despite these repeated criticisms, there has been no comprehensive, quantitative assessment of how experimental and real-world plant communities really differ, and whether these differences invalidate the experimental results. Here, we compare data from two of the largest and longest-running grassland biodiversity experiments globally (Jena Experiment, Germany; BioDIV, USA) to related real-world grassland plant communities in terms of their taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and functional-trait composition. We found that plant communities of biodiversity experiments have greater variance in these compositional features than their real-world counterparts, covering almost all of the variation of the real-world communities (82-96%) while also containing community types that are not currently observed in the real world. We then re-analysed a subset of experimental data that included only ecologically-realistic communities, i.e. those comparable to real-world communities. For ten out of twelve biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships, biodiversity effects did not differ significantly between the full dataset of biodiversity experiments and the ecologically-realistic subset of experimental communities. This demonstrates that the results of biodiversity experiments are largely insensitive to the inclusion/exclusion of unrealistic communities. By bridging the gap between experimental and real-world studies, these results demonstrate the validity of inferences from biodiversity experiments, a key step in translating their results into specific recommendations for real-

The origins of agriculture were key events in human history, during which people came to depend for their food on small numbers of animal and plant species. However, the biological traits determining which species were domesticated for food provision, and which were not, are unclear. Here, we investigate the phylogenetic distribution of livestock and crops, and compare their phenotypic traits with those of wild species. Our results indicate that phylogenetic clustering is modest for crop species but more intense for livestock. Domesticated species explore a reduced portion of the phenotypic space occupied by their wild counterparts and have particular traits in common. For example, herbaceous crops are globally characterized by traits including high leaf nitrogen concentration and tall canopies, which make them fast-growing species and proficient competitors. Livestock species are relatively large mammals with low basal metabolic rates, which indicate moderate to slow life histories. Our study therefore reveals ecological differences in domestication potential between plants and mammals. Domesticated plants belong to clades with traits that are advantageous in intensively managed high-resource habitats, whereas domesticated mammals are from clades adapted to moderately productive environments. Combining comparative phylogenetic methods with ecologically relevant traits has proven useful to unravel the causes and consequences of domestication.