Best survival results are achieved with three-drug regimens containing FU, an anthracycline, and cisplatin. Among these, regimens including FU as bolus exhibit a higher rate of toxic deaths than regimens using a continuous infusion of FU, such as epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion FU.
Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care. In addition, combination chemotherapy improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU. All patients should be tested for their HER-2 status and trastuzumab should be added to a standard fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin regimen in patients with HER-2 positive tumours. Two and three-drug regimens including 5-FU, cisplatin, with or without an anthracycline, as well as irinotecan or docetaxel-containing regimens are reasonable treatment options for HER-2 negative patients.
In this randomized controlled multicenter trial, we compared endoscopic variceal banding ligation (VBL) with propranolol (PPL) for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. One hundred fifty-two cirrhotic patients with 2 or more esophageal varices (diameter >5 mm) without prior bleeding were randomized to VBL (n ؍ 75) or PPL (n ؍ 77). The groups were well matched with respect to baseline characteristics (age 56 ؎ 10 years, alcoholic etiology 51%, Child-Pugh score 7.2 ؎ 1.8). The mean follow-up was 34 ؎ 19 months. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Neither bleeding incidence nor mortality differed significantly between the 2 groups. Variceal bleeding occurred in 25% of the VBL group and in 29% of the PPL group. The actuarial risks of bleeding after 2 years were 20% (VBL) and 18% (PPL). Fatal bleeding was observed in 12% (VBL) and 10% (PPL). It was associated with the ligation procedure in 2 patients (2.6%). Overall mortality was 45% (VBL) and 43% (PPL) with the 2-year actuarial risks being 28% (VBL) and 22% (PPL). 25% of patients withdrew from PPL treatment, 16% due to side effects. In conclusion, VBL and PPL were similarly effective for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. VBL should be offered to patients who are not candidates for longterm PPL treatment. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;40:65-72.) U pper intestinal hemorrhage is a common and often fatal complication of portal hypertension. It occurs in 30% of patients with cirrhosis, with each bleeding episode bearing a mortality risk of 30% to 50%. 1-3 Thus, prophylactic treatment prior to the first bleeding (i.e., primary prophylaxis) is mandatory in highrisk patients. 4,5 Nonselective -blockers (i.e., propranolol, nadolol)-the current standard prophylaxis-reduce bleeding incidence and bleeding-related mortality. 6 -9 However, pharmacotherapy with -blockers is not optimal: 30% to 40% of patients will not achieve a sufficient reduction of portal pressure to prevent bleeding. 10 -12 Furthermore, contraindications and side effects are common 13,14 and may require withdrawal, which reincreases the risk of bleeding. 15 Therefore, therapeutic alternatives to -blockers are warranted. Due to heterogeneous results, prophylactic endoscopic sclerotherapy is not recommended for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding. 5,7 Compared to injection sclerotherapy, 16 variceal banding ligation (VBL) allows a more rapid and more effective eradication of varices with fewer side effects. 17 To date, only 2 trials comparing VBL with standard treatment (-blockers) have been fully published. 13,18 The results of these studies are controversial and partly inconclusive. In the present article, we report on the results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing propranolol (PPL) and banding ligation for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care. In addition, combination chemotherapy improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU, but the effect size is much smaller. Among the combination chemotherapy regimens studied, best survival results are achieved with regimens containing 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin. In this category, ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-FU) is tolerated best.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.