Objective-To determine the distribution and importance of various factors, especially the preventable ones, that contribute to cardiac decompensation and subsequent hospital admission for heart failure. Methods-During a one year period patients were prospectively recruited and evaluated during their hospital stay by means of a structured personal interview by trained medical staV and through clinical examination and laboratory investigation. Setting-The cardiological department at a teaching aYliated general community hospital in Berlin, Germany. Patients-Consecutive sample of 179 patients admitted to hospital with acute decompensation of pre-existing heart failure. Main outcome measures-Proportional distribution of causative factors leading to hospital admission for heart failure; relative importance of preventable factors; details of patient compliance with diet and medication, and knowledge about medication. Results-Mean (SD) age was 75.4 (9.9) years. Potential causative factors for decompensated heart failure were identified in 85.5% of patients. Lack of adherence to the medical regimen was the most commonly identified factor and was regarded as the cause of the cardiac decompensation in 41.9% of cases. Non-compliance with drugs was found in 23.5% of patients. Other factors related to hospital admission were coronary ischaemia (13.4%), cardiac arrhythmias (6.1%), uncontrolled hypertension (5.6%), and inadequate preadmission treatment (12.3%). In all, 54.2% of admissions could be regarded as preventable. Conclusions-Many hospital admissions for decompensation of chronic heart failure in patients at a district hospital in Berlin are preventable. Measures are necessary to improve this situation and evaluation of programmes that include patient education, patient follow up, and physician training is needed. (Heart 1998;80:437-441)
The reliability of free energy simulations
(FES) is limited by
two factors: (a) the need for correct sampling and (b) the accuracy
of the computational method employed. Classical methods (e.g., force
fields) are typically used for FES and present a myriad of challenges,
with parametrization being a principle one. On the other hand, parameter-free
quantum mechanical (QM) methods tend to be too computationally expensive
for adequate sampling. One widely used approach is a combination of
methods, where the free energy difference between the two end states
is computed by, e.g., molecular mechanics (MM), and the end states
are corrected by more accurate methods, such as QM or hybrid QM/MM
techniques. Here we report two new approaches that significantly improve
the aforementioned scheme; with a focus on how to compute corrections
between, e.g., the MM and the more accurate QM calculations. First,
a molecular dynamics trajectory that properly samples relevant conformational
degrees of freedom is generated. Next, potential energies of each
trajectory frame are generated with a QM or QM/MM Hamiltonian. Free
energy differences are then calculated based on the QM or QM/MM energies
using either a non-Boltzmann Bennett approach (QM-NBB) or non-Boltzmann
free energy perturbation (NB-FEP). Both approaches are applied to
calculate relative and absolute solvation free energies in explicit
and implicit solvent environments. Solvation free energy differences
(relative and absolute) between ethane and methanol in explicit solvent
are used as the initial test case for QM-NBB. Next, implicit solvent
methods are employed in conjunction with both QM-NBB and NB-FEP to
compute absolute solvation free energies for 21 compounds. These compounds
range from small molecules such as ethane and methanol to fairly large,
flexible solutes, such as triacetyl glycerol. Several technical aspects
were investigated. Ultimately some best practices are suggested for
improving methods that seek to connect MM to QM (or QM/MM) levels
of theory in FES.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.