A procedure was developed that very effectively distinguishes between IdUrd and CldUrd incorporated in the DNA of cell nuclei and chromosomes. For double staining we used the rat anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody from Sera-lab that binds specifically to CldUrd and BrdUrd but not to IdUrd, in combination with the mouse anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody from Becton Dickinson. This antibody binds to all three halogenated deoxyuridines, but when the nuclei are washed in TRIS buffer with a high salt concentration the antibodies linked to CldUrd-labelled DNA are removed. When analysing the effect of the deoxyuridines on the cell cycle we found that the growth kinetics of Chinese hamster cells were not changed by adding IdUrd or CldUrd for 30 min at a concentration of 10 microM, whereas adequate double labelling required only 2 min pulses. The effectiveness of the technique was demonstrated in two model experiments. The first test concerned the assessment of cell recruitment in the central areas of slow-growing clones, after addition of fresh medium. The second experiment focussed on the spatial resolution of the method. Double-labelled metaphase chromosomes showed interspersed green and red replication bands with a spacing corresponding with medium resolution Giemsa banding patterns.

The total variation of chromosome peak positions, in bivariate distributions of Hoechst 33258 and chromomycin A3 fluorescence of 19 healthy individuals, was compared with the experimental variation, determined from 23 bivariate distributions of chromosomes prepared separately from a single cell lineage. The experimental variation in Hoechst and chromomycin fluorescence and the relative chromosomal DNA content were determined from experiments performed over several days. The additional variance contributed by time was the same as the daily variance. The accuracy by which the relative chromosomal DNA content can be calculated from bivariate peak positions was investigated. A least squares method was used to fit the distributions of relative DNA content, obtained, respectively, from mono-and bivariate flow analyses of chromosomes from the same cell lineage. In general the DNA contents match quite well, but for a few chromosomes a difference was found, statistically discernible at the 5% level. The average relative chromosomal DNA content of the chromosomes from the 19 normal individuals, calculated from bivariate peak positions, showed a linear relation with the estimates published by other investigators.

A method is described that is designed to compare, in a standardized procedure, bivariate flow karyotypes of Hoechst 33258 (HOW Chromomycin A3 (CA) stained human chromosomes from cells with aberrations with a reference flow karyotype of normal chromosomes. In addition to uniform normalization of normal and abnormal flow karyotypes, the main purpose is detection of structurally abnormal chromosomes in often complex karyotypes of tumor cells. The method, which has been implemented in a computer program, consists of a comparison of individual chromosome peaks with the positions of peaks in the flow karyotype constituted by normal chromosomes and takes into account the natural variability in base composition of normal chromosomes among healthy individuals. Flowkaryotypes are normalized using an iterative fitting procedure, using corrections for (1) amplification of HO and CA fluorescence, (2) cross-talk between the fluorescence signals of HO and CA, and (3) offset of the HO and CA origin. Flow karyotypes of two cell lines, one with a simple deletion and the other with more complex karyotypic changes, were analyzed. The results of flow analysis were found to be in general agreement with the cytogenetic analysis of quinacrine banded karyotypes. o 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Using slit-scan flow cytometry, the shape of human metaphase chromosomes, as expressed in their centromeric index (CI), and the DNA content of the chromosomes have been used as parameters in bivariate flow karyotyping. The resolution of the DNA vs CI flow karyogram of the larger chromosomes up to chromosome 13 is much higher than the resolution obtained in the DNA-based monovariate flow karyogram. Chromosome length appears to be an important factor in the resolution of the DNA vs CI-based flow karyogram. A method has been developed to obtain chromosomes in suspension that are long enough for adequate analysis. Several chromosomes that cannot be distinguished or are difficult to discriminate in the DNA-based karyogram can now be distinguished as individual peaks, e.g., chromosomes 1 and 2. The peak of chromosomes 9-12 can be separated into two peaks formed by chromosomes 9 and 11, and 10 and 12, respectively. The advantage of the system applied in this study is that the DNA vs CI analysis is performed on-line, allowing chromosomes to be sorted on the bases of their CI. Pulse shapes of the selected chromosomes can be recorded simultaneously with the transmission of the sorting command. The purity of the sorted fraction can be estimated from the off-line inspection of these pulse shapes. Fractions of chromosome 1 have been sorted out on the basis of the CI information, centrifuged on slides, fixed and subsequently banded with trypsin and Giemsa or hybridized with the chromosome 1 specific probe, pUC 1.77. The observed purity under the selected conditions ranges from 80%-99% and is in accordance with the estimates of the purities made on the basis of the simultaneously recorded pulse shapes. Fixation of the chromosome suspension prior to flow cytometric analysis and sorting appears to be essential for the preservation of their morphology and has no adverse influence on the resolution of Giemsa banding or on the quality of in situ hybridization.

A method combining flow sorting and molecular cytogenetic techniques for the identification of unknown marker chromosomes is described. In this study, the bladder tumor cell line J82 was used, which was known to carry a marker chromosome of the size of chromosome 7 in every cell. From the cytogenetic analysis of Q-banded metaphase cells, it was shown to be composed of approximately 40% presumably the greater part of chromosome 20 and for the rest microscopically unidentifiable material. This marker chromosome was found using flow cytometric analysis to form an independent peak and hence was suitable for isolation using dual-parameter sorting after staining with Hoechst 33258 and chromomycin A3. Subsequently, the marker was isolated by dual-parameter sorting. DNA amplification of 300 isolated chromosomes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the Alu-primer Bk33 and the LINES-primer LH5 was carried out. After purification of the amplified product, a yield of 5 microns of DNA was obtained. The DNA was labelled using Bio-11-dUTP and applied to human lymphocyte metaphase cells in a suppressive in situ hybridization procedure. Fluorescence was visible over chromosome 20 and over the distal one-half of 6p. Together the fluorescent regions accounted for only approximately 60% of the marker length, indicating a possible duplication of chromosome 20 material. This was confirmed by applying bicolor in situ hybridization using chromosome 6- and 20-specific DNA libraries to metaphase cells of the J82 cells.