BackgroundPatients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are disproportionately vulnerable to COVID-19 and its complications due to the older age and significant burden of comorbid conditions. Data about the impact of COVID-19 on the ESKD population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is scarce, and this study aims to bridge this gap. MethodThis is a retrospective cohort study that included ESKD patients who were receiving either in-center hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) for at least three months and were hospitalized due to COVID-19 at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh (KAMC) between March 2020 and March 2021. Of note, the incenter hemodialysis means that the patients come to the dialysis center three times per week to receive their dialysis sessions, as home hemodialysis is not available at our center. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to explore the association of clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters with ICU admission and mortality. ResultsA total of 104 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 62.6 (SD=17.4) years, 101 (97%) were on HD, predominantly through a central venous catheter (72%), and 53 patients (51%) were male. Patients with COVID-19 were either asymptomatic (42%) or had mild symptoms (37%), mainly cough and fever. At the time of admission, 37 patients (36%) had extrapulmonary symptoms, and 13 patients (12%) had altered mental status. Normal chest X-ray (48%), followed by bilateral lung infiltrates (24%), and unilateral lung infiltrate (11%) were the most common radiological findings. We did not observe any thromboembolic events. Twenty patients (19%) required ICU admission and 19 patients (18%) died during hospitalization. Predictors for in-hospital mortality were: 1) the need for inotropes (adjusted OR: 53.01, p=0.006), 2) age (adjusted OR: 1.07, p=0.019), and 3) C-reactive protein (CRP) level on admission (adjusted OR: 1.02, p=0.04). We did not find any strong predictor for ICU admission. ConclusionOur study demonstrated that COVID-19 carries significant mortality and morbidity in the ESKD population. Age, inotropic support requirement and elevated CRP on admission predicted mortality in our population. The high rate of adverse outcomes of COVID-19 among ESRD patients calls for strict implementation of preventive measures, including vaccination, social distancing, and universal masking at the level of both the healthcare providers and patients. Further studies are needed to assess the association of COVID-19 and hypercoagulability ESKD population.

IntroductionRoad traffic accidents (RTAs) are considered a major cause of death in Saudi Arabia. As seat belt compliance provides significant safety among drivers, a camera detection system has been implemented in March 2018 to enforce seat belt utilization, which can decrease the severity of road traffic injuries. There are no previous studies in the country that have assessed the effectiveness of a seat belt camera detection system on the severity of RTA-related injuries. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical Trauma Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included 688 adult patients who were involved in RTAs from the period of March 2016 to March 2020. A data extraction form included sociodemographics, clinical variables, and outcome measures. The data were analyzed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) to evaluate the primary outcome measures: mortality, ejection from the vehicle, ICU admissions, and severity measures (injury severity score (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)) before and after the implementation of seat belt detection system. Associations of the outcome measures in the pre-implementation and the post-implementation periods' seat belt detection were assessed using regression tests. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the mean age between the pre-implementation and postimplementation periods of the seat belt detection system (31.39 years and 32.57 years, respectively). All of the outcome measures have improved following the implementation of the seat belt detection system. Mortality and ejection rates decreased significantly with 58% lower risk of death (OR= 0.42; 95% CI= 0.2,0.8) and 37% lower risk of ejection (OR= 0.63; 95% CI= 0.42,0.94). ICU admissions showed a slight decline in the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (30.37% vs. 31.37, p<0.7764). Severity measures (ISS and GCS) were slightly improved in the post-implementation period. Head and neck injuries were dominant in the pre-implementation period, and chest injuries were the most common body injuries after the implementation. ConclusionThis study highlights the direct association between compliance with seat belt use and the primary outcome measures among patients who survived a road traffic accident. All of the outcome measures showed improvement in the post-implementation period, which indicates the effectiveness of the newly implemented seat belt detection system. These findings raise awareness to the public in regard to seat belt compliance.