PSA relapse-free survival rates after SBRT compare favorably with other definitive treatments for low and intermediate risk patients. The current evidence supports consideration of SBRT among the therapeutic options for these patients.
BackgroundRadiotherapy is an increasingly preferred treatment option for localized prostate cancer, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) a relatively established modality of therapeutic irradiation. The present study analyzes the toxicity and biochemical efficacy of SBRT in 100 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System.MethodsOne hundred patients were treated with SBRT at the Radiation Oncology department of San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. All patients included in this IRB-approved protocol-driven prospective study had biopsy-proven prostate cancer. Risk category was low in 41, intermediate in 42, and high in 17 patients. The patients were treated with CyberKnife-SBRT (CK-SBRT), the prescription dose was 35 Gy in five fractions, corresponding to 92 Gy in 2-Gy fractions (α/β =1.5 Gy); 29 patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).ResultsMedian follow-up was 36 months (range, 6–76 months). Acute Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in respectively 12% and 18% of the patients; there were no Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities. Late Grade 1, 2, and 3 genitourinary toxicities occurred in 4%, 3%, and 1% of the patients, respectively; late Grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in two patients and Grade 2 toxicity in one patient; no late gastrointestinal toxicities of grade 3 or 4 were observed. Median PSA nadir was 0.45 ng/ml at 36 months for all patients. In the SBRT-monotherapy group, the median PSA nadir at 36 months was 0.62 ng/ml; in the ADT-SBRT group, it was 0.18 ng/ml. Four patients had clinical recurrence: one local, two lymph nodes, and one to the bone. Ninety-six patients had no evidence of biochemical or clinical recurrence. A benign PSA bounce of median 1.08 ng/ml occurred in 12% of the 71 SBRT monotherapy patients at a mean 23 months (range, 18–30 months).ConclusionsIn this study CK-SBRT has provided promising outcomes in localized prostate cancer with good PSA response, minimal toxicity and patient inconvenience.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a new treatment modality for prostate cancer. The current study evaluates CyberKnife SBRT and reports toxicity and early Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) kinetics. From June 2006 to August 2009, 45 low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients received Cyberknife SBRT of 35 Gy in five fractions with 95% minimum target coverage. Median follow-up was 20-months (range 6-42-months). Seventeen patients received androgen-deprivation therapy also. Acute complications were mild, short-lived and no greater than Grade 2 by RTOG scale. Late toxicities consisted of one patient (2.2%) experiencing Grade 2 rectal, one patient (2.2%) Grade 3 and four patients (8.8%) with Grade 1 urinary toxicity. PSA in all patients progressively declined from a mean 4.7 ng/ml baseline to 1.48 ng/ml at three months, to 0.68 ng/ml at 12 months and to 0, 35 ng/ml at 24 months. The 28 hormon-naive patients had the mean PSA value of 1.1 ng/ml at one year from a mean 6.65 ng/ml baseline. There was a significant PSA value reduction in 11 hormone therapy patients with low baseline PSA value (< or = 1 ng/ml) from 0.37 down 0.14 ng/ml (p value 0.0068) at one year. Moreover, 14 low risk patients gave better results of mean PSA value than 17 Intermediate risk patients 0.43 ng/ml vs. 0.93 ng/ml (p value 0.02) at one year. No patient had biochemical failure at last follow-up. Hypofractionated SBRT appears to have potential against prostate cancer. Low toxicity and encouraging biochemical control support its use in early-stage prostate cancer. Results encourage further follow-up and larger studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.