We study the problem of the optimal execution of a large trade in the presence of nonlinear transient impact. We propose an approach based on homotopy analysis, whereby a well behaved initial strategy is continuously deformed to lower the expected execution cost. We find that the optimal solution is front loaded for concave impact and that its expected cost is significantly lower than that of conventional strategies. We then consider brute force numerical optimization of the cost functional; we find that the optimal solution for a buy program typically features a few short intense buying periods separated by long periods of weak selling. Indeed, in some cases we find negative expected cost. We show that this undesirable characteristic of the nonlinear transient impact model may be mitigated either by introducing a bid-ask spread cost or by imposing convexity of the instantaneous market impact function for large trading rates.

Large tick assets, i.e. assets where one tick movement is a significant fraction of the price and bid-ask spread is almost always equal to one tick, display a dynamics in which price changes and spread are strongly coupled. We introduce a Markov-switching modeling approach for price change, where the latent Markov process is the transition between spreads. We then use a finite Markov mixture of logit regressions on past squared returns to describe the dependence of the probability of price changes. The model can thus be seen as a Double Chain Markov Model. We show that the model describes the shape of return distribution at different time aggregations, volatility clustering, and the anomalous decrease of kurtosis of returns. We calibrate our models on Nasdaq stocks and we show that this model reproduces remarkably well the statistical properties of real data.

We study the problem of the optimal execution of a large trade in the presence of nonlinear transient impact. We propose an approach based on homotopy analysis, whereby a well behaved initial strategy is continuously deformed to lower the expected execution cost. We find that the optimal solution is front loaded for concave impact and that its expected cost is significantly lower than that of conventional strategies. We then consider brute force numerical optimization of the cost functional; we find that the optimal solution for a buy program typically features a few short intense buying periods separated by long periods of weak selling. Indeed, in some cases we find negative expected cost. We show that this undesirable characteristic of the nonlinear transient impact model may be mitigated either by introducing a bid-ask spread cost or by imposing convexity of the instantaneous market impact function for large trading rates.

No abstract

No abstract