No abstract

In the last few years technical improvements have produced a dramatic shift from traditional open surgery towards a minimally invasive approach for the management of early endometrial cancer. Advancement in minimally invasive surgical approaches has allowed extensive staging procedures to be performed with significantly reduced patient morbidity. Debate is ongoing regarding the choice of a minimally invasive approach that has the most effective benefit for the patients, the surgeon, and the healthcare system as a whole.Surgical treatment of women with presumed early endometrial cancer should take into account the features of endometrial disease and the general surgical risk of the patient. Women with endometrial cancer are often aged, obese, and with cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities that increase the risk of peri-operative complications, so it is important to tailor the extent and the radicalness of surgery in order to decrease morbidity and mortality potentially derivable from unnecessary procedures. In this regard women with negative nodes derive no benefit from unnecessary lymphadenectomy, but may develop short- and long-term morbidity related to this procedure. Preoperative and intraoperative techniques could be critical tools for tailoring the extent and the radicalness of surgery in the management of women with presumed early endometrial cancer. In this review we will discuss updates in surgical management of early endometrial cancer and also the role of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of lymph node status in influencing surgical options, with the aim of proposing a management algorithm based on the literature and our experience.

Ovarian cancer is still the first cause of death among female malignancies. The standard treatment adopted in ovarian cancer is a radical surgical treatment or cytoreduction, followed by six courses of platinum-based chemotherapy; second-line regimens are associated with severe side effects. GnRH analogs could represent an alternative therapeutical approach. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of GnRH analogs in the management of platinum-resistant ovarian cancers. We enrolled 12 patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer, previously treated with six courses of platinum-paclitaxel. In second-line therapy, we used leuprolide on 1, 8, and 28 days of treatment. CA 125 levels were recorded for each patient. One case of clinical partial response was obtained (8.3%). Stable disease was diagnosed in three patients (25%). Progression was recorded in eight cases (66.7%). Progression-free survival was 6 months. The treatment was well tolerated by patients. The high tolerability and the results obtained with leuprolide versus platinum in second-line therapy might permit a better use of the analogs for advanced ovarian cancer.