Objectives: To compare the route from injury to rehabilitation, and the outcome of care in a large sample of traumatic (T) and nontraumatic (NT) spinal cord lesion (SCL) patients at their 'first admission'. Setting: T and NT SCI patients consecutively admitted to 37 SCL centres in Italy. Method: Data were recorded on simple, computerised, closed-question forms, which were Centrally collected and analysed. Descriptive and inferential analysis was conducted to define the characteristics and compare the T and NT populations, and to identify correlations among the variables examined: time from the event to admission (TEA); pressure sores (PS) on admission; length of stay (LoS) and destination on discharge. Results: A total of 1014 SCL patients, 67.5% with a lesion of T and 32.5% of NT aetiology were analysed. The subjects in the T group were younger (median 34 versus 58 years), with higher probability of cervical involvement (OR 2.47, CI 1.8-3.4) and completeness of the lesion (OR 3.0, CI 2.3-4.0), shorter median TEA(37 versus 64 days, Po0.0001) and less frequent admission from home (3.6 versus 17.4%) compared to the NT group. TEA and PS on admission were analysed as indicators of the efficacy of the courses from injury to rehabilitation. Longer TEA was reported for people with NT aetiology, admitted to rehabilitation centre (RC), not locally resident, transferred from certain wards and to a lesser degree female subjects and those with complications on admission. PS were associated to www.nature.com/sc completeness of lesion, longer TEA, admission to RC, nonlocal residence and coming from general intensive care units, or general surgery wards. Median LoS was 99 days (mean 116 and range 0-672), and was statistically shorter in the NT group (122 versus 57 median, Po0.00001). Upon discharge, bladder and bowel autonomy were, respectively, obtained in 68.1 and 64.5% of the whole population without significant difference between the T and NT groups. A total of 80.2% of patients were discharged home and the following factors: not living alone, being discharged after longer LoS, having sphincterial autonomy and no PS, were all independent predictors of outcome. Conclusion: There are important obstacles in the admission route to rehabilitation facilities, greater for NT, as longer TEA and more complications on admission testify. Moreover, the LoS is shorter for NT population. Our findings suggest that rehabilitation outcome could be improved through an early multidisciplinary approach and better continuity between acute and rehabilitation care, especially for the 'neglected' NT SCL patients.
The purpose of this longitudinal study was to investigate if the presence of frontal motor deficits in parkinsonians without signs of global intellectual impairment may have a predictive value for the development of a progressive dementing process during the course of the illness. An examination of the higher level of motor organization, using skills thought to depend upon the integrity of the frontal regions, was performed by 30 parkinsonian patients who did not present any signs of general intellectual impairment. According to their performance, as compared with controls, they were divided into two subgroups: those with and those without frontal dysfunctions. After a mean period of 4 years, a second neuropsychological examination was carried out to assess any eventual change of mental status. The results suggest that frontal dysfunctions may be observed several years before the appearance of generalized intellectual impairment and may be considered one of the predictive factors for development of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Careful consideration of these defects during examination of motor abilities may be of value in the clinical management of parkinsonian patients.
Parkinsonians with predominantly unilateral signs provide an interesting experimental means to evaluate if asymmetric nigro-striatal degeneration may affect neuropsychological functions. The aim of our study was to establish if the side of onset of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, right (PDR) or left (PDL), determines a selective pattern of cognitive performances. Furthermore, we verified if PDR and PDL groups show a different frequency of dementia. PDR and PDL patients with at least seven years of disease duration, matched for age, schooling, severity of extrapyramidal symptomatology and index of lateralization, were evaluated by using an extensive neuropsychological battery aimed at assessing hemispheric cognitive asymmetries. Current side of greater motor impairment was the same as the one affected at the onset of the disease. Only subtle differences in the profile of neuropsychological dysfunction emerged from the comparison of PDR and PDL subjects. Moreover, the number of parkinsonians showing dementia syndrome was the same in both groups. Our results suggest that the side of onset of motor impairment does not significantly influence the cognitive performances in PD. Subcortical anatomic and/or functional asymmetries seem to play a less important role in the intellectual functions than in motor activities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.