Abstract-In this letter we propose the Rao test as a simpler alternative to the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for multisensor fusion. We consider sensors observing an unknown deterministic parameter with symmetric and unimodal noise. A decision fusion center (DFC) receives quantized sensor observations through error-prone binary symmetric channels and makes a global decision. We analyze the optimal quantizer thresholds and we study the performance of the Rao test in comparison to the GLRT. Also, a theoretical comparison is made and asymptotic performance is derived in a scenario with homogeneous sensors. All the results are confirmed through simulations.
Received-energy test for non-coherent decision fusion over a Rayleigh fading multiple access channel (MAC) without diversity was recently shown to be optimum in the case of conditionally mutually independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sensor decisions under specific conditions [C. R. Berger, M. Guerriero, S. Zhou, and P. Willett, "PAC vs. MAC for Decentralized Detection Using Noncoherent Modulation," IEEE Trans.]. Here, we provide a twofold generalization, allowing sensors to be non identical on one hand and introducing diversity on the other hand. Along with the derivation, we provide also a general tool to verify optimality of the received energy test in scenarios with correlated sensor decisions. Finally, we derive an analytical expression of the effect of the diversity on the large-system performances, under both individual and total power constraints.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.