BACKGROUND & AIMS Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA. METHODS We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated. CONCLUSIONS We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies.

No abstract

U p to 20% of health care personnel (HCP) were found to be infected with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) 1 in the outbreak in northern Italy. 2 Recommendations on patient and HCP protection have been made, such as postponing procedures, triage, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and creation of differentiated in-hospital pathways. 3,4 However, several barriers against the adoption of these strategies exist, including cultural factors and shortages of medical resources; therefore, there are few reports of real-world experiences and outcomes with their adoption. 5 The aim of this survey was to investigate the burden of COVID-19 on endoscopic activity in a high-risk area of COVID-19 outbreak, approaches to evaluating patients, adoption and compliance of HCP with protective measures, and initial possible viral transmission outcomes from endoscopy units within a large, community-based setting (both between patients and HCP and between HCP). MethodsThe study was conducted as a survey between March 16 and March 21, 2020. Directors of emergency departments in highrisk areas of northern Italy (Supplementary Figure 1) were invited by e-mail to complete a questionnaire (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Participation was voluntary. Additional methodology is provided in the Supplementary Material. Results Characteristics of the Endoscopy UnitsA total of 42 endoscopy units were invited, of which 41 participated (97.6%). Most respondents (n ¼ 37, 90.2%) were from high-volume endoscopy units, for a total of 968 endoscopy personnel, including 323 endoscopists, 496 nurses, and 149 health care assistants. Changes in Endoscopy Activity Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019All endoscopy units had patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in their hospital. All but 1 center (40/41, 97.6%) reduced Infection Prevention and Control Measures for Coronavirus Disease 2019Regarding the preventive measures taken after the first Italian case (February 18, 2020), 5 (12.2%) endoscopy units did not take any measures, 29 (70.7%) endoscopy units adopted a triage for risk stratification of COVID-19 infection, 7 (17.1%) endoscopy units decreased endoscopic See editorial on page 36.

Background and Aims: A recent electron microscopy study suggested that dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) are specific for acid reflux-damaged esophageal epithelium. Electron microscopy is, however, expensive and difficult to apply to routine biopsies. The aims of this study are to establish a method for assessing DIS on light microscopy of esophageal biopsies and to estimate its association with current clinicopathological parameters of esophagitis. Materials and Methods: 21 patients with reflux symptoms were investigated. Light microscopy biopsies were assessed for DIS size by a semiquantitative method and computer-assisted, static morphometry. A DIS score accounting for DIS size and distribution was assigned to each patient and its association with 30 clinicopathological variables investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Both the semiquantitative method and static morphometry identified 4 different classes of DIS size. The DIS score was significantly and independently associated with the esophageal symptoms score, the histological score of esophagitis and the relevant morphometry data. Conclusions: DIS may be efficiently assessed during light microscopy of routine esophageal biopsies. Since correlation with both the histology and the symptoms of esophagitis, the DIS score may be considered a novel parameter of esophagitis and is suggested for the routine evaluation of esophageal biopsies in patients with reflux disease.

Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is extremely uncommon in children and is usually associated with a long-standing history of constipation or pseudo-obstruction. An early diagnosis and management are crucial in order to prevent the appearance of hemorrhagic infarction of the twisted loop, avoiding further complications such as necrosis, perforation and sepsis. In patients with no evidence of peritonitis or ischemic bowel, treatment starts with resuscitation and detorsion of the SV, accomplished by means of sigmoidoscopy and concomitant rectal tube placement. The bowel is then prepared and surgery is undertaken electively during the same hospitalization. We report a detailed review of the literature focusing on technical details, risks and benefits of endoscopic management of SV in childhood.