The oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran effectively prevents arterial and venous thromboembolism using fixed doses without the need for adjustment according to laboratory results. Dabigatran is eliminated from the circulation by ∼80% through the kidneys. However, the in vitro anticoagulant effect of dabigatran may be necessary to determine in special patient populations such as in the elderly, for renal impairment, before operations, bleeding or thrombotic episodes, and to monitor self-compliance. Several clotting and thrombin-specific chromogenic substrate assays are available to analyze the biological activity of dabigatran. All of them are prolonged in the presence of dabigatran. This article reports the effects of dabigatran on clinical routine assays and the potential usefulness for determination in special risk groups of patients when overdose or lack of compliance are suspected.

Background: Assessing the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran may be useful in certain clinical settings. When plasma sampling is not available, serum or urine samples may provide another option for dabigatran determinations. Methods: Dabigatran was assessed in patients on treatment under real-life conditions in plasma samples by four clotting time-based assays and in plasma, serum, and urine samples by two chromogenic substrate methods. Results: The concentrations of dabigatran in patients' plasma samples were not different for the Hemoclot test (106.8 ± 89.4 ng/mL) and the ecarin clotting time (ECT, 109.5 ± 74.5 ng/mL, p = 0.58). Activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombinase-induced clotting time showed low correlations with the other assays. Chromogenic assays measured similar concentrations as Hemoclot and ECT. For both chromogenic assays, the concentrations of dabigatran were about 70% lower in serum than in plasma samples (p < 0.0001). The intra-class coefficient (ICC, Bland-Altman analysis) was strong comparing ECT, Hemoclot thrombin inhibitor (HTI) assay, and the two chromogenic assays (r = 0.889-0.737). The ICC was low for comparisons of the chromogenic assays of serum vs. plasma values (ICC, 0.15 and 0.66). The ICC for the determination of

No abstract