The purpose of this study is to investigate which kinds of stress women experience during childbirth in a foreign country and to explore whether childbirth in a foreign country influences women's mental health. The study was a quantitative and qualitative mixed study. Forty-five Japanese women, born and raised in Japan and who gave birth in Hawaii, USA, were telephone-interviewed within 1 year after childbirth. The stress factors that emerged were: language barrier, distance from family and friends, different culture, and health-care attitude about childbirth. Half of the participants experienced emotional dysfunction during their pregnancy. All primiparas experienced postpartum depression. The participants who had the maternity blues tended to have postpartum depression. Help from the participants' mothers after childbirth decreased postpartum depression. The importance of mental health for foreign-born primiparas emerges during the perinatal period.

No abstract

This study compares 796 pregnancy outcomes at a maternity center (BMC) with 804 hospital (TJUH) pregnancy outcomes. The samples of pregnant women from the participating institutions were matched on sociodemographic characteristics; analysis of outcomes was performed controlling for medical-obstetric risk. Differences between the institutions were found mainly among women with low intrapartum risk. For these women, neonatal morbidity and length of infant nursery stay were lower at BMC IntroductionDuring the past decade, alternative approaches to conventional in-hospital maternity care have increased in number and visibility. Their purpose is to offer parturient women a satisfying birth experience in a safe environment and at lower costs than conventional care. Growing attention to alternative birth settings was recently expressed in the report of the National Academy of Sciences Committee concerning the Assessment of Alternative Birth Settings.' Although the safety of such alternative approaches is of paramount importance and has been the subject of considerable controversy,2 little information is available to allow an objective evaluation of their safety. Published reports on birth centers as well as in-hospital alternatives have been largely descriptive.3-5 Only one published study of an inhospital alternative birthing center included a comparison

OBJECTIVES. We examined the pregnancy outcomes of three ethnic groups: African-American Blacks, non-Hispanic Whites, and Filipinos. In an attempt to reduce ethnic dissimilarities in parental employment and access to health care, this investigation compared the single-live-birth outcomes of married, adult women who resided in the state of Hawaii and who indicated that their spouse was on active-duty status in the US military. METHODS. The data for this study were obtained from the 1979-1989 Hawaii vital-record file that provides linked live birth-infant death information. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for the independent effects of maternal factors on low birthweight and neonatal mortality. RESULTS. Significant differences in maternal age, maternal education, paternal education, parity, hospital of delivery, and use of prenatal care were observed among the ethnic groups. The results of a logistic regression analysis of low birthweight indicated significantly higher risks for Filipinos and Blacks compared with Whites. For very low birthweight, only an increased risk for Blacks was observed. No ethnic differences in neonatal mortality were found. CONCLUSIONS. This investigation revealed more comparable infant mortality experiences among the ethnic groups in spite of persistent birthweight differences.

No abstract