Objective. Myofiber necrosis without prominent inflammation is a nonspecific finding in patients with dystrophies and toxic or immune-mediated myopathies. However, the etiology of a necrotizing myopathy is often obscure, and the question of which patients would benefit from immunosuppression remains unanswered. The aim of this study was to identify novel autoantibodies in patients with necrotizing myopathy.Methods. Muscle biopsy specimens and serum samples were available for 225 patients with myopathy. Antibody specificities were determined by performing immunoprecipitations from 35 S-methionine-labeled HeLa cell lysates. Selected biopsy specimens were stained for membrane attack complex, class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and endothelial cell marker CD31.Results. Muscle biopsy specimens from 38 of 225 patients showed predominantly myofiber necrosis. Twelve of these patients had a known autoantibody association with or other etiology for their myopathy. Sixteen of the remaining 26 sera immunoprecipitated 200-kd and 100-kd proteins; this specificity was observed in only 1 of 187 patients without necrotizing myopathy. Patients with the anti-200/100 autoantibody specificity had proximal weakness (100%), high creatine kinase levels (mean maximum 10,333 IU/liter), and an irritable myopathy on electromyography (88%). Sixtythree percent of these patients had been exposed to statins prior to the onset of weakness. All patients responded to immunosuppressive therapy, and many experienced a relapse of weakness when the medication was tapered. Immunohistochemical studies showed membrane attack complex on small blood vessels in 6 of 8 patients and on the surface of non-necrotic myofibers in 4 of 8 patients. Five of 8 patients had abnormal capillary morphology, and 4 of 8 patients expressed class I MHC on the surface of non-necrotic myofibers.Conclusion. An anti-200/100-kd specificity defines a subgroup of patients with necrotizing myopathy who previously were considered to be autoantibody negative. We propose that these patients have an immune-mediated myopathy that is frequently associated with prior statin use and should be treated with immunosuppressive therapy.

Objective The myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) is a severe necrotizing immune-mediated disease characterized by rapidly progressive proximal muscle weakness, markedly elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, and poor responsiveness to traditional immunosuppressive therapies. Reports on the efficacy of B cell depletion therapy for anti-SRP associated myopathy are mixed. We describe eight patients with anti-SRP associated myopathy and their response to treatment with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. Methods We identified eight patients with myopathy who tested positive for anti-SRP antibodies by immunoprecipitation and were treated with rituximab as part of clinical care. We reviewed their medical records to assess clinical, serologic, and histologic characteristics and response to therapy. In five patients, serum was collected before and after rituximab therapy. Autoantibodies were detected by immunoprecipitation and quantitated by densitometry, and the percent decreases in anti-SRP autoantibody levels were calculated. Results Six of eight patients who had been refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy demonstrated improved manual muscle strength and/or decline in CK levels as early as two months after rituximab treatment. Three patients sustained the response for twelve to eighteen months after initial dosing. All patients were continued on adjunctive corticosteroids, but dosages were substantially reduced after rituximab. Quantitative levels of serum anti-SRP antibodies also decreased after rituximab treatment. Conclusions B cell depletion therapy with rituximab is effective for patients with myopathy associated with anti-SRP. The substantial decrease in anti-SRP antibody levels after rituximab treatment also suggests that B cells and anti-SRP antibodies may play a role in the pathogenesis of this myopathy.

Treating HIV infections with drugs that block viral replication selects for drug-resistant strains of the virus. Particular inhibitors select characteristic resistance mutations. In the case of the nucleoside analogs 3TC and FTC, resistant viruses are selected with mutations at amino acid residue 184 of reverse transcriptase (RT). The initial change is usually to M184I; this virus is rapidly replaced by a variant carrying the mutation M184V. 3TC and FTC are taken up by cells and converted into 3TCTP and FTCTP. The triphosphate forms of these nucleoside analogs are incorporated into DNA by HIV-1 RT and act as chain terminators. Both of the mutations, M184I and M184V, provide very high levels of resistance in vivo; purified HIV-1 RT carrying M184V and M184I also shows resistance to 3TCTP and FTCTP in in vitro polymerase assays. Amino acid M184 is part of the dNTP binding site of HIV-1 RT. Structural studies suggest that the mechanism of resistance of HIV-1 RTs carrying the M184V or M184I mutation involves steric hindrance, which could either completely block the binding of 3TCTP and FTCTP or allow binding of these nucleoside triphosphate molecules but only in a configuration that would prevent incorporation. The available kinetic data are ambiguous: one group has reported that the primary effect of the mutations is at the level of 3TCTP binding; another, at the level of incorporation. We have approached this problem using assays that monitor the ability of HIV-1 RT to undergo a conformational change upon binding a dNTP. These studies show that both wild-type RT and the drug-resistant variants can bind 3TCTP at the polymerase active site; however, the binding to M184V and M184I is somewhat weaker and is sensitive to salt. We propose that the drug-resistant variants bind 3TCTP in a strained configuration that is salt-sensitive and is not catalytically competent.