Background: Amantadine has been used off-label to improve alertness after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal of this study is to assess the mean change at 72 hours and in course of therapy (COT) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score after amantadine initiation and to correlate the change in GCS score with participation in physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) among patients with TBI receiving amantadine during the first hospitalization. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included patients ≥18 years old hospitalized for a TBI from August 2012 to February 2018 and received ≥1 dose of amantadine to increase alertness. The primary endpoint is the mean change in 72-hour GCS score after amantadine initiation. The secondary endpoint is the mean change in COT GCS score after amantadine initiation and the correlation between the change in GCS score and percent PT and OT participation at 72 hours and during the COT. Results: Seventy-nine patients were included. The mean age of patients was 41 years, and 79.8% of the patients were men. The mean change in 72-hour GCS score was +0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-1.42, P = .027), and the mean change in COT GCS score was +2.29 (95% CI = 1.68-2.90, P < .001). There was no significant correlation between the increase in GCS score and percent PT/OT session participation at 72 hours and during the COT, r = −0.15 ( P = .24) and r = −0.02 ( P = .74), respectively. The percent PT/OT session participation at 72-hour post-amantadine initiation was 61.3% compared with 65.9% during the COT. Conclusion: There were small but statistically significant increases in the mean change at 72 hours and in COT GCS score; however, they were not correlated with percent PT/OT participation. Other studies are needed to determine the appropriate time and GCS score to initiate amantadine along with the optimal dose in the inpatient setting.

The validity of the central venous and water-filled oesophageal catheter technique as a measure of pleural pressure changes was tested in ten healthy subjects in different body positions during inspiratory efforts with occluded airways, by comparing the simultaneous changes in mouth pressure (delta Pm) taken to represent pleural pressure changes, in central venous pressure (delta Pcv) and in oesophageal pressure (delta Poes). delta Pcv/delta Pm values were close to unity in the sitting and left lateral positions, whereas in the supine and right lateral position, substantial deviations from unity were found in some instances. delta Poes/delta Pm values were close to unity in all positions, except some rare instances. No appreciable phase difference between delta Pm/delta Poes and delta Pm/delta Pcv was found when the amplitude ratios were close to unity. We conclude that valid measurements of pleural pressure changes can be obtained in most instances with the central venous and the water-filled oesophageal catheter system according to the occlusion test procedure.

SummaryBackground: Dyspnea is a common symptom and can be caused by many different conditions. The detection of congestive heart failure (CHF) is sometimes difficult.Hypothesis: The pulse amplitude ratio (PAR) measured by the Finapress procedure during a Valsalva maneuver can detect elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) accurately over a wide range of values.Methods: Comparison of the estimated LVEDP by PAR with the invasively measured LVEDP before and after ventriculography during coronography was made in 101 consecutive stable patients referred for chest pain and/or chronic dyspnea.Results: A significant correlation was found between the catheter-measured LVEDP (range 3-40 mmHg) and the PAR (R 2 = 0.70, p < 0.001). The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) of the PAR to detect an LVEDP > 15 mmHg can be considered to be excellent, with an area under the ROC curve Conclusions: The observed likelihood ratios confirm that the PAR determined by the Finapress procedure may be a useful bedside diagnostic tool in patients with cardiac conditions.

We have studied 28 patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure at different levels of externally applied positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe). We describe and compare a computed method of measuring "effective" elastance of the total respiratory system (Ers,eff) with the static values of elastance of the total respiratory system (Ers,st), obtained with the end-inflation occlusion technique. Ers,eff was computed by an original device (Heres, R.P.A., Belgium), also the effective resistance of the total respiratory system was calculated. At zero end-expiratory pressure set by the ventilator (ZEEP). Ers,eff averaged 29.5 +/- 13.5 cm H2O x L-1 while Ers,st non-corrected for intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) averaged 36.4 +/- 15.1 cm H2O x L-1 and Ers,st corrected for PEEPi averaged 28.2 +/- 13.4 cm H2O x L-1. The small difference between Ers,eff and Ers,st corrected for PEEPi was statistically significant and these two values were highly correlated (r = 0.98). This significant difference disappeared rapidly with PEEPe and probably reflects a frequency-dependance due to pendelluft. We also observed that PEEPi was present in 21 of 27 patients at ZEEP. Our results also indicate that low levels of PEEP may improve Ers in hyperinflated COPD patients, without inducing further hyperinflation. In conclusion, values of Ers,eff are very similar to static values corrected for PEEPi and permit an accurate and rapid approach to the management of ventilated patients.

The data reported is observational and indicates the need for future studies to establish a valid relationship of the MIC data over time in our institution particularly among our gram negative organisms, to monitor patterns of antimicrobial resistance.