Tyrosinemia type 1 (HT1) is an inborn error of tyrosine catabolism caused by fumarylacetoacetase deficiency. Biochemically, this results in accumulation of toxic metabolites including succinylacetone. Clinically, HT1 is characterized by severe liver, kidney, and neurological problems. Treatment with NTBC and dietary restriction of tyrosine and phenylalanine have strongly improved outcome, but impaired neurocognitive development has been reported. Whether impaired neurocognitive outcome results from high blood tyrosine or low blood phenylalanine concentrations is currently unknown. In this report, two HT1 newborns, diagnosed by neonatal screening, are presented. The first patient showed low phenylalanine concentrations, growth retardation, neurological impairments, and skin problems, clearly improving after institution of phenylalanine supplementation (~30 mg/kg/ day) at age 6 months, while both blood phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations increased. In the second patient, phenylalanine supplementation (~20 mg/kg/day) was initiated as soon as low phenylalanine concentrations were observed at age 19 days. On this regimen, blood phenylalanine concentrations increased, and hypophenylalaninemia was less frequently observed than in the first patient, whereas blood tyrosine concentrations tended to increase. Clinically, no growth, neurological, or skin problems have been observed. The combination of knowledge obtained from these cases suggests that hypophenylalaninemia rather than hypertyrosinemia during the first months of life may impair neurocognitive development in young HT1 infants. Phenylalanine supplementation should really be considered in HT1 patients with consistently low blood phenylalanine concentrations during the first months of life. However, the minimal phenylalanine concentrations acceptable and the optimal phenylalanine supplementation regimen require further investigation.

Background: Treatment of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 with nitisinone and phenylalanine and tyrosine restricted diet has largely improved outcome, but the best blood sampling time for assessment of metabolic control is not known. Aim: To study diurnal and day-to-day variation of phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations in tyrosinemia type 1 patients. Methods: Eighteen tyrosinemia type 1 patients aged >1 year (median age 7.9 years; range 1.6-20.7) were studied. Capillary blood samples were collected 4 times a day (T1: pre-breakfast, T2: pre-midday meal, T3: before evening meal, and T4: bedtime) for 3 days. Linear mixed-effect models were used to investigate diurnal and day-to-day variation of both phenylalanine and tyrosine. Results: The coefficients of variation of phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations were the lowest on T1 (13.8% and 14.1%, respectively). Tyrosine concentrations did not significantly differ between the different time points, but phenylalanine concentrations were significantly lower at T2 and T3 compared to T1 (50.1 mmol/L, 29.8 mmol/L, and 37.3 mmol/L, respectively). Conclusion: Our results indicated that for prevention of too low phenylalanine and too high tyrosine concentrations, measurement of phenylalanine and tyrosine pre-midday meal would be best, since phenylalanine concentrations are the lowest on that time point. Our results also indicated that whilst blood tyrosine concentrations were stable over 24 h, phenylalanine fluctuated. Day-to-day variation was most stable after an overnight fast for both phenylalanine and tyrosine. Therefore, in tyrosinemia type 1 patients the most reliable time point for measuring phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations to enable interpretation of metabolic control is pre-breakfast.