Background: A system-based Quality Improvement Education intervention (QIEi) was developed to improve disease management for T2D patients with/at-risk of CVD/CKD who may benefit from SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA. The QIEi aimed to improve competencies of PCPs, team collaboration and patient communications. Methods: The QIEi was deployed to PCPs at 2 sites from a USA integrated delivery system. Practice Assessments (PrA) and a pre-intervention EHR data review confirmed the gaps and guided QI team discussions. Team leaders designed webinars on best practices (recorded for later view), and the groups discussed cases, designed process improvements and communication strategies (EHR Smart phrases, clinical reinforcement materials explaining treatments, and enhanced After Visit Summary). Evaluation included PrA (pre=140; post=55), EHR data, smart phrase usage, and qualitative interviews (n=10). Results: PCPs’ comfort discussing treatment with patients increased (Table 1). Interviewees reported an increase in patient interface, confidence educating patients and team engagement. The QIEi led to system-based changes and sustained clinical reinforcement material adoption. Conclusion: A team based QIEi can result in effective design, pilot/adoption of patient materials/EHR tools, supporting patient conversations and fostering informed decisions. Disclosure V.Makin: Speaker's Bureau; Bayer Inc. G.Jacobs: None. B.Dennis frampton: None. K.M.Pantalone: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Diasome, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Bayer Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Twin Health, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Corcept Therapeutics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk. S.Kawczak: None. S.Murray: None. P.Mcfadden: None. P.Rao: None. Funding Eli Lilly and Company; Merck & Co., Inc.
82 Background: Gastric/colorectal cancer (G&CRC) are among the most prevalent cancers. Efforts are ongoing to better assess their clinical/genomic factors. HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) testing is strongly recommended in clinical practice to guide treatment. An accredited education program (GetSMART) was launched online (January 2021–April 2022) to equip healthcare providers (HCPs) with knowledge, skills, and confidence to accurately assess/apply molecular testing and therapy options for metastatic G&CRC patients. Methods: A knowledge/confidence-based assessment was embedded in four modules to measure learners’ knowledge mastery (% answering correctly with confidence) pre/post-activity. Self-reported confidence and anticipated performance in clinical practice were measured before/after each module. At the end of program, HCPs were asked about their commitment to change. McNemar’s test was applied to assess statistical significance in pre-post for paired items, and descriptive analysis for non-paired items. Results: Overall, 925 unique HCPs engaged in GetSMART, 31% (n=284) completed all modules, of which 57% (n=163) consented analysis of their data. A statistically significant increase (p<0.05) was measured in percentage of HCPs demonstrating knowledge mastery, confidence, and commitment to change their practice from pre to post across four competencies, except for percentage of HCPs “often”/“always” engaging patients in shared decision-making (SDM) (3, Performance). Largest gains in knowledge mastery/confidence were noted for HCPs’ ability to anticipate/manage adverse events (AE) ( 4A); and for anticipated performance, in HCPs considering appropriate treatment. Post-activity, 66% (98/149) of HCPs intended to change practice based on module content, 83% (70/84) of whom were “highly”/“somewhat” confident to make changes. The activity’s anticipated impact on patients was rated “major”/“moderate” by 69% (103/149) of HCPs. Conclusions: Identification of HER2 aberrations in mG&CRC and its appropriate treatment selection remains challenging in oncology care. This evaluation demonstrated that GetSMART positively impacted HCPs’ knowledge, confidence, and anticipated performance in clinical practice to enhance health outcomes of HER2+ mG&CRC patients. [Table: see text]
Background: A Quality Improvement Educational Intervention (QIEi) was developed to improve disease management for T2D patients with CVD/CKD who may benefit from SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA. An aim was to assess the change in the number of prescriptions of these two medication classes. Methods: The QIEi was deployed at two practice sites of a large Integrated Health Care System. A team was formed comprising of endocrinologists and 3 PCPs at each site. EHR data review confirmed the gaps and guided QI project discussions. Process improvements and communication strategies were implemented. All the PCPs at the practice sites (N=18 each) received education on these two medication classes. Cased-based and didactic CME accredited webinars designed to help improve knowledge, decision-making and implement best practices were made available for on-demand participation across the health care system. Results: Prescription rates of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA at the intervention (N=4247 baseline, 4033 follow up) and non-intervention sites (N=98637 baseline, 91923 follow up) were obtained pre- and 6 months post QIEi. Odds of GLP-1RA prescription dropped by 2% (p=0.75) at the intervention sites and by 6% (p<0.001) at the non-intervention sites. The decrease was not significantly different across sites (p=0.41). There was a small increase in SGLT2i prescription at the intervention sites (p=0.90), while the odds of use decreased by 3% (p=0.017) at non-intervention sites. This was not significantly different across sites (p=0.54). Conclusion: No meaningful change in prescriptions post-QIEi at the two intervention sites was observed. While it did improve knowledge and engagement, it did not translate into prescription increases. Perhaps more time is needed to observe system-wide changes and/or other factors need to be considered to increase prescriptions for this patient population. Further studies investigating prescribing barriers are warranted. Disclosure P.Rao: None. V.Makin: Speaker's Bureau; Bayer Inc. S.Kawczak: None. P.Lazure: None. J.F.Bena: None. P.Mcfadden: None. G.Jacobs: None. K.M.Pantalone: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Diasome, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Bayer Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Twin Health, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Corcept Therapeutics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk. Funding Eli Lilly and Company; Merck & Co., Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.