Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the leading cause of acute liver failure in high-income countries. Acute cholestasis is one of the most common forms of hepatotoxicity induced by azathioprine. It usually begins during the first year of treatment, with most cases reported during the first month. We describe an uncommon case of DILI that occurred after 22 months of drug administration. A woman in her 50s was hospitalised because of jaundice and asthenia. She had been treated with azathioprine for myasthenia gravis during the last 2 years. Acute cholestatic injury was diagnosed. After ruling out most common causes of cholestasis, azathioprine was withdrawn and subsequent histological findings in liver biopsy were consistent with drug-induced cholestatic liver damage. After discontinuation of azathioprine, biochemical parameters progressively normalised and remarkable clinical improvement was achieved. With this report, we suggest that azathioprine should be considered among the causes of liver injury, despite long treatment duration.

No abstract

Background Colonic pseudopolyps are a frequent finding in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Yet there are no published data describing the characteristics of pseudopolyposis in intestinal ultrasound (IUS). This study aimed at identifying the key features of pseudopolyposis in IUS. Methods This case-control study included 8 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s colitis with extensive left colon pseudopolyposis and 24 matched IBD patients without pseudopolyps at colonoscopy. Luminal (diameters, thickening, stratification, margins, and vascularity) and intraluminal (vascular signals at color Doppler), and extraluminal (mesenteric fat) parameters of the left colon were compared. Anonymized still images and videos of these patients were blindly reviewed to estimate the accuracy in detecting this condition. Results Among the IUS parameters assessed, the anteroposterior diameter ≥ 12 mm and the presence of luminal vascular signals were significantly correlated with pseudopolyposis (table 1). The detection of both these findings were able to detect extensive pseudopolyposis with a sensitivity of 62.5% a specificity of 96.8%, a positive predictive value of 83.3% and negative predictive value of 88.46%, and an overall accuracy of 87.5% (table 2). Conclusion This is the first study describing the IUS features of pseudopolyposis in IBD. The potential use of IUS to assess pseudopolyposis might have an impact on IUS monitoring and surveillance of IBD patients with condition.

Background Current data about long-term use of vedolizumab (VDZ) in ulcerative colitis (UC) versus Crohn’s disease (CD) patients are limited. We aimed to assess whether there are differences in term of long-term efficacy and safety of VDZ in UC vs. CD patients. Methods Clinical activity was scored according to the Mayo score in UC and to the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD. The primary endpoints were the achievement of clinical remission within 6 month of treatment, maintenance of clinical remission during a long follow-up, and safety. Secondary endpoints were clinical response to treatment, achievement of mucosal healing (MH), steroid discontinuation, and treatment optimization during the follow-up. Results The study group consisted of 729 patients (475 patients with UC and 254 CD patients with CD) with a median follow-up of 18 (interquartile range 6-36) months. Clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment was achieved in 488 (66.9%) patients, higher in CD patients (74.4 vs. 62.9, p<0.000) while, at the maximal follow-up, it was achieved and maintained in 81.5% of patients (UC vs. CD, p=0.667). At uni- and multivariate analysis, reaching clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment (p=0.001) and being naïve to biologics were significantly associated with longer clinical remission (p<0.0001). Long-term follow up clinical response was significantly higher in UC vs. CD (p=0.023) and surgery occurred more frequently in CD (p=0.04), while no difference were found between UC and CD about the other secondary endpoints Conclusion Overall, no significant differences were found about the long-term use of VDZ in UC vs. CD. However, we identified some parameters the can help the physician to predict the long-term efficacy of this drug.