No abstract

Background Cancer of the larynx in the intermediate/advanced stage still presents a major challenge in terms of controlling the disease and preserving the organ. Among therapeutic options, open partial horizontal laryngectomy is proposed as a function‐sparing surgical technique. Methods We analyzed the clinical outcomes of 555 patients with laryngeal cancer staged pT3 to pT4a who underwent open partial horizontal laryngectomy. Results Five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), locoregional control, local control, laryngectomy‐free survival, and laryngeal function preservation rates were 84.6%, 84.2%, 86.3%, 90.6%, 93.3%, and 91.2%, respectively. DFS, locoregional control, and laryngeal function preservation rates were significantly affected by pT4a staging (68.1%, 71.7%, and 78.0%, respectively), whereas pN+ influenced only DFS (≤72.6%) and locoregional control (≤79.6%). Conclusions Open partial horizontal laryngectomy with a modular approach can be considered effective in terms of prognostic and functional results in intermediate‐stage and selected advanced‐stage laryngeal cancers, even with subglottic extension. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E649–E657, 2016

Supracricoid laryngectomies (SCLs) are conservative organ-sparing surgical techniques for the treatment of selected T2-T4 laryngeal carcinomas. Although these procedures allow preserving the larynx and its functions, in several countries SCLs are not adopted in oncological protocols. One of the possible reasons to account for this choice is the complexity of post-surgical in-hospital management and the variability in functional results. The aim of this review is to analyse the literature on functional results after SCLs as knowledge on functional results will help in focusing on what is needed in the future to reach more standardized post-surgical procedures and homogeneous outcomes. The analysis of the length of hospital stay, feeding-tube removal time and time to eventual tracheotomy decannulation showed a marked variability across authors and centres. Several factors may come into play, including health-system organizations in different countries. In most studies in-depth description of the criteria applied for discharge, tracheotomy tube removal and commencement of oral feeding were not reported. Moreover, the review on swallowing functional outcomes showed marked variability, as well as a lack of consensus on how to assess swallowing after SCLs. The analysis of voice functional outcomes also revealed a marked variability; surprisingly, the tools applied in the assessments were very often not adequate for substitution voice. Literature review showed that voice- and swallowing-related quality of life are often satisfactory but the variability among centres is still too large. Therefore, there is a need for clearer clinical recommendations on early post-surgical management, tracheal-cannula and feeding-tube removal criteria, voice- and swallowing-assessment protocol, rehabilitation need and timing.