Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications.

Background:Chemoresistance is a significant clinical problem in pancreatic cancer (PC) and underlying molecular mechanisms still remain to be completely understood. Here we report a novel exosome-mediated mechanism of drug-induced acquired chemoresistance in PC cells.Methods:Differential ultracentrifugation was performed to isolate extracellular vesicles (EVs) based on their size from vehicle- or gemcitabine-treated PC cells. Extracellular vesicles size and subtypes were determined by dynamic light scattering and marker profiling, respectively. Gene expression was examined by qRT-PCR and/or immunoblot analyses, and direct targeting of DCK by miR-155 was confirmed by dual-luciferase 3′-UTR reporter assay. Flow cytometry was performed to examine the apoptosis indices and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in PC cells using specific dyes. Cell viability was determined using the WST-1 assay.Results:Conditioned media (CM) from gemcitabine-treated PC cells (Gem-CM) provided significant chemoprotection to subsequent gemcitabine toxicity and most of the chemoresistance conferred by Gem-CM resulted from its EVs fraction. Sub-fractionation grouped EVs into distinct subtypes based on size distribution and marker profiles, and exosome (Gem-Exo) was the only sub-fraction that imparted chemoresistance. Gene expression analyses demonstrated upregulation of SOD2 and CAT (ROS-detoxifying genes), and downregulation of DCK (gemcitabine-metabolising gene) in Gem-Exo-treated cells. SOD/CAT upregulation resulted, at least in part, from exosome-mediated transfer of their transcripts and they suppressed basal and gemcitabine-induced ROS production, and partly promoted chemoresistance. DCK downregulation occurred through exosome-delivered miR-155 and either the functional suppression of miR-155 or restoration of DCK led to marked abrogation of Gem-Exo-mediated chemoresistance.Conclusions:Together, these findings establish a novel role of exosomes in mediating the acquired chemoresistance of PC.

Our understanding of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) has assumed a new perspective in light of the recent advances in research. Although classical NEPC is rarely seen in the clinic, focal neuroendocrine trans-differentiation of prostate adenocarcinoma occurs in about 30% of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) cases, and represents a therapeutic challenge. Even though our knowledge of the mechanisms that mediate neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) is still evolving, the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a key driver of this phenomenon is increasingly becoming evident. In this review, we discuss the molecular, cellular, and therapeutic mediators of NED, and emphasize the role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in orchestrating the phenotype. Understanding the role of the TME in mediating NED could provide us with valuable insights into the plasticity associated with the phenotype, and reveal potential therapeutic targets against this aggressive form of PCa.