Experimentally characterizing evapotranspiration (ET) in different biomes around the world is an issue of interest for different areas of science. ET in natural areas of the Brazilian Pampa biome has still not been assessed. In this study, the actual ET (ETact) obtained from eddy covariance measurements over two sites of the Pampa biome was analyzed. The objective was to evaluate the energy partition and seasonal variability of the actual ET of the Pampa biome. Results showed that the latent heat flux was the dominant component in available energy in both the autumn–winter (AW) and spring–summer (SS) periods. Evapotranspiration of the Pampa biome showed strong seasonality, with highest ET rates in the SS period. During the study period, approximately 65% of the net radiation was used for the evapotranspiration process in the Pampa biome. The annual mean ET rate was 2.45 mm d−1. ET did not show to vary significantly between sites, with daily values very similar in both sites. The water availability in the Pampa biome was not a limiting factor for ET, which resulted in a small difference between the reference ET and the actual ET. These results are helpful in achieving a better understanding of the temporal pattern of ET in relation to the landscape of the Pampa biome and its meteorological, soil, and vegetation characteristics.
Atmospheric downward longwave radiation flux (L↓) is a variable that directly influences the surface net radiation and consequently, weather and climatic conditions. Measurements of L↓ are scarce, and the use of classical models depending on some atmospheric variables may be an alternative. In this paper, we analyzed L↓ measured over the Brazilian Pampa biome. This region is located in a humid subtropical climate zone and characterized by well defined seasons and well distributed precipitation. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the eleven classical L↓ models for clear sky with one-year experimental data collected in the Santa Maria experimental site (SMA) over native vegetation and high relative humidity throughout the year. Most of the L↓ estimations, using the original coefficients, underestimated the experimental data. We performed the local calibration of the L↓ equations coefficients over an annual period and separated them into different sky cover classifications: clear sky, partly cloudy sky, and cloudy sky. The calibrations decreased the errors, especially in cloudy sky classification. We also proposed the joint calibration between the clear sky emissivity equations and cloud sky correction function to reduce errors and evaluate different sky classifications. The results found after these calibrations presented better statistical indexes. Additionally, we presented a new empirical model to estimate L↓ based on multiple regression analysis using water vapor pressure and air temperature. The new equation well represents partial and cloudy sky, even without including the cloud cover parameterization, and was validated with the following five years in SMA and two years in the Cachoeira do Sul experimental site (CAS). The new equation proposed herein presents a root mean square error ranging from 13 to 21 Wm−2 and correlation coefficient from 0.68 to 0.83 for different sky cover classifications. Therefore, we recommend using the novel equation to calculate L↓ over the Pampa biome under these specific climatic conditions.
The eddy covariance technique was used to estimate the sensible and latent heat flux between the atmosphere and the Pampa Biome in the period from 20 November 2013 to 20 November 2014. Annual Evapotranspiration (ET) was 1021 mm, corresponding to 55% of the annual precipitation. The ET is highly correlated with the net radiation (97%). The Bowen ratio was indicated that most of the available energy was used for the evaporation. The evaporative fraction remained about average, with greater variability in the colder months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.