COVID-19 pandemic may affect children's mental health. Children <18 years in-patiently admitted for mental health emergencies between March 2020 and June 2021 were compared to those admitted in the same period of 2018–2019 in terms of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. There were 49 admissions in the pre-pandemic period and 60 in the pandemic period (IRR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.84–1.79), with the latter more likely to have a family history of psychiatric disorders, a personal history of physical disturbances, present with suicidal risk, and being diagnosed with an externalizing disorder. This study underscores the increased need for pediatric mental health services.

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) encompass a group of complex conditions with onset during the early developmental period. Such disorders are frequently associated with a number of neuropsychiatric features, the most prevalent ones being autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, intellectual disability, communication and specific learning disorders, and motor disorders. These conditions are characterized by wide genetic and clinical variability, and although they were previously conceptualized as childhood-limited disorders, NDDs are progressively being recognized as persistent conditions with a potentially relevant impact on the quality of life and overall functioning during adult life. In addition, emerging evidence seems to point towards the hypothesis of a neurodevelopmental continuum, according to which NNDs could portray different time-dependent outcomes, depending on the severity of the altered brain development. Despite representing lifelong phenotypes, they are often not promptly identified and/or managed in adulthood. In this regard, specific guidelines on clinical and therapeutic approaches for these conditions have not yet been delineated. In this view, future research investigations should be encouraged to broaden available knowledge, characterize the clinical course of NDDs across an individual’s lifespan, and better understand the patterns of aging-related concerns in adults with an NDD diagnosis. Additionally, considering the difficulties many young adults encounter while transitioning from childhood to adult mental health services, new, specific programs should be developed and existing programs should be implemented to improve the transition process and for the management of NDDs in adulthood.

Many studies have investigated the impact of gender on mental health, but only a few have addressed gender differences in mental health risk and prevention. We conducted a narrative review to assess the current state of knowledge on gender-specific mental health preventive interventions, along with an analysis of gender-based risk factors and available screening strategies. Out of 1598 articles screened using a comprehensive electronic search of the PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, 53 were included for review. Among risk factors for mental health problems, there are individual, familiar, social, and healthcare factors. Individual factors include childhood adversities, which show gender differences in distribution rates. However, current childhood abuse prevention programs are not gender-specific. Familiar factors for mental health problems include maternity issues and intimate partner violence, and for both, some gender-specific preventive interventions are available. Social risk factors for mental health problems are related to education, employment, discrimination, and relationships. They all display gender differences, but these differences are rarely taken into account in mental health prevention programs. Lastly, despite gender differences in mental health service use being widely known, mental health services appear to be slow in developing strategies that guarantee equal access to care for all individuals.

Background: The diathesis-stress paradigm and the cannabinoid-hypothesis have been proposed as possible pathophysiological models of schizophrenia. However, they have historically been studied independently of each other. Objective: This PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review aimed at reappraising the interplay be- tween the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the endocannabinoid (eCB) system in psy- chosis-spectrum disorder risk and outcome. Methods: All pathophysiological and outcome clinical studies, concomitantly evaluating the two sys- tems in psychosis-spectrum disorder risk and different stages of illness, were gathered from electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus), and discussed. Results: 41 eligible outputs were extracted, focusing on at least a biological measure (9 HPA-related studies: 4 eCB-interventional, 1 HPA-interventional, 1 both HPA-interventional and non-interventional, 3 non-interventional; 2 eCB-related studies: non-interventional), environmental measures only (29 studies: 1 eCB- interventional, 28 non-interventional), and genetic measures (1 study: non-interventional). In- dependent contributions of aberrancies in the two systems to the physiopathology and outcome of psy- chosis were confirmed. Also, concomitant alterations in the two systems, either genetically defined (e.g., CNR1 genetic variation), biologically determined (e.g., dysfunctional HPA axis or endocanna- binoid signaling), or behaviorally imputed (e.g., cannabis use, stress exposure, and response), were consistently reported in psychosis. Further, a complex biobehavioral perturbation was revealed not on- ly within each system (e.g., cannabis use affecting the eCB tone, stress exposure affecting the HPA ax- is), but also across the two systems (e.g., THC affecting the HPA axis, childhood trauma affecting the endocannabinoid signaling). Conclusion: There is a need to concomitantly study the two systems’ mechanistic contribution to psychosis in order to establish more refined biological relevance.

Background: Factitious Disorder is a condition included among psychiatric disorders, where symptoms are intentionally produced to seek medical attention. Its epidemiology, treatment, and outcome are largely unknown. Objective: To increase knowledge of the condition, we discuss a pediatric case where the patient feigned neuropsychiatric symptoms. Methods: A 15-year-old female adolescent presented with neuropsychiatric symptoms suggestive of rare conditions such as Delusional Misidentification Syndrome [i.e., Capgras and Fregoli syndromes] and Developmental Prosopagnosia as well as epileptic seizures. Results: When a Delusional Misidentification Syndrome was suspected, she was treated with Risperidone. Due to suboptimal response, Alprazolam and Sertraline were added and then Risperidone was cross-titrated to Haloperidol. The condition severity led to her admission to an inpatient Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit. MRI scan and electroencephalographic recording were normal. The self- and parent-reported psychological assessment indicated several psychiatric symptoms. Instead, the clinician-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology suggested a fake-bad profile and neuropsychiatric symptom simulation. Along with evidence of incongruent symptoms between the patient’s interviews, such investigations led to the diagnosis of Factitious Disorder. Psychopharmacological treatment was discontinued, and psychological support was offered to the patient and her parents. Conclusion: Increasing knowledge about Factitious Disorder is needed.