The main challenge in diagnosing and managing thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAA/D) is represented by the early detection of a disease that is both deadly and “elusive”, as it generally grows asymptomatically prior to rupture, leading to death in the majority of cases. Gender differences exist in aortic dissection in terms of incidence and treatment options. Efforts have been made to identify biomarkers that may help in early diagnosis and in detecting those patients at a higher risk of developing life-threatening complications. As soon as the hereditability of the TAA/D was demonstrated, several genetic factors were found to be associated with both the syndromic and non-syndromic forms of the disease, and they currently play a role in patient diagnosis/prognosis and management-guidance purposes. Likewise, circulating biomarker could represent a valuable resource in assisting the diagnosis, and several studies have attempted to identify specific molecules that may help with risk stratification outside the emergency department. Even if promising, those data lack specificity/sensitivity, and, in most cases, they need more testing before entering the “clinical arena”. This review summarizes the state of the art of the laboratory in TAA/D diagnostics, with particular reference to the current and future role of molecular-genetic testing.

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) represents one of the principal causes of neurological morbidity and mortality worldwide. For a prompt and efficient cerebral blood restoration, intravenous treatment with rt-PA is often combined with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) which provides cerebral thrombi (CT) as study material, allowing the investigation of its cellular composition, morphological and histopathological features. Indeed, the determination of stroke etiology, typically defined by the TOAST classification, is paramount for prognostic factors, outcome, and management of the event. Aim of the study is therefore to highlight and analyze gene expression profiles in thrombotic tissue and peripheral blood (PB) in the comparison between strokes of cardioembolic (CE) and atherosclerotic (LAA) origin. Methods: We performed gene expression profiles of 92 patients. CT were stored in RNA later and RNA was extracted by PAX gene blood miRNA kit. The global gene expression profile was assessed by Affymetrix technology using GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 combined with Affymetrix Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) Software. Results: Currently, we focused our attention on CT data analysis. The analysis revealed a significant difference (p-value<0.05 and FoldChange=2 as threshold) in gene expression when comparing LAA and CE stroke. In particular, from CT of atherosclerotic origin emerges an overexpression of 1766 genes. Prominent among them are genes such as MMP-9, TGFB, TGFBR and CXCL1, primarily involved in neutrophil-mediated immunity, Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) disruption processes, and associated with atherosclerotic plaque instability and related to poor neurological outcome, suggesting a deleterious role in human brain injury. As concerns CE patients, 57 genes mainly involved in transcriptional regulatory processes turn out to be significantly overexpressed. Conclusions: Transcriptome profiling is a powerful weapon for revealing expression patterns associated with complex disorders. The variation of gene expression profiles confirmed and extended several known pathophysiological mechanisms and may be one way of delineating different stroke etiology.