Background Systemic sclerosis is characterised by progressive cutaneous and organ fibrosis. Among all organs, a subclinical heart involvement is difficult to detect through conventional imaging. Design We evaluated whether speckle tracking-derived global longitudinal strain could help detect early subclinical systolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis patients without overt clinical involvement. Methods A case-control, single-centre study on 52 systemic sclerosis patients and 52 age and gender-matched controls. Patients with structural heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension were excluded. For every patient, standard echocardiographic and speckle tracking-derived variables for the systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle and right ventricle were acquired. Results Traditional parameters of left and right systolic function did not differ between systemic sclerosis patients and controls (all P = ns). Left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain was significantly impaired in patients with systemic sclerosis when compared to controls (-19.2% vs. -21.1%; P = 0.009 and -18.2% vs. -22.3%; P = 0.012, respectively). Systemic sclerosis patients had a 2.5-fold increased risk of subclinical left ventricular systolic impairment (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-5.5; P = 0.027) and a 3.3-fold increased risk of subclinical right ventricular systolic impairment when compared to controls (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.4-7.7; P = 0.004). Alterations in the myocardial deformation pattern of systemic sclerosis patients were homogeneous in the right ventricle and eccentric in the left ventricle. Conclusions While traditional echocardiographic parameters are ineffective in detecting subclinical systolic impairment, reduced global longitudinal strain is common in patients with systemic sclerosis and significant for both ventricles. Global longitudinal strain could become a low-cost, non-invasive and reliable tool in order to detect early cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis patients.
Introduction
Comparison data on management of device‐related complications and their impact on patient outcome and healthcare utilization between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S‐ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV‐ICD) are lacking. We designed this prospective, multicentre, observational registry to compare the rate, nature, and impact of long‐term device‐related complications requiring surgical revision on patient outcome and healthcare utilization between patients undergoing S‐ICD or TV‐ICD implantation.
Methods and Results
A total of 1099 consecutive patients who underwent S‐ICD or TV‐ICD implantation were enrolled. Propensity matching for baseline characteristics yielded 169 matched pairs. Rate, nature, management, and impact on patient outcome of device‐related complications were analyzed and compared between two groups. During a mean follow‐up of 30 months, device‐related complications requiring surgical revision were observed in 20 patients: 3 in S‐ICD group (1.8%) and 17 in TV‐ICD group (10.1%; p = .002). Compared with TV‐ICD patients, S‐ICD patients showed a significantly lower risk of lead‐related complications (0% vs. 5.9%; p = .002) and a similar risk of pocket‐related complications (0.6 vs. 2.4; p = .215) and device infection (0.6% vs. 1.2%; p = 1.000). Complications observed in S‐ICD patients resulted in a significantly lower number of complications‐related rehospitalizations (median 0 vs. 1; p = .013) and additional hospital treatment days (1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 6.5 ± 4.4 days; p = .048) compared with TV‐ICD patients.
Conclusions
Compared with TV‐ICD, S‐ICD is associated with a lower risk of complications, mainly due to a lower risk of lead‐related complications. The management of S‐ICD complications requires fewer and shorter rehospitalizations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.