No abstract

Purpose i) To assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of the hyaline cartilage (HC) of the metacarpal head (MH) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in healthy subjects (HS) both qualitatively and quantitatively. ii) To calculate the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the MH cartilage thickness measurement. iii) To correlate the qualitative scoring system and the quantitative assessment. Materials and Methods US examination was performed on 280 MHs of 20 patients with RA and 15 HS using a very high frequency probe (up to 22 MHz). HC status was evaluated both qualitatively (using a five-grade scoring system) and quantitatively (using the average value of the longitudinal and transverse measures). The HC of MHs from II to V metacarpophalangeal joint of both hands were scanned independently on the same day by two rheumatologists to assess inter-observer reliability. All subjects were re-examined using the same scanning protocol and the same US setting by one sonographer after a week to assess intra-observer reliability. Results The inter-observer agreement and intra-observer agreement were moderate to substantial (k = 0.66 and k = 0.73) for the qualitative scoring system and high (ICC = 0.93 and ICC = 0.94) for the quantitative assessment. The SDD of the MH cartilage thickness measurement was 0.09 mm. A significant correlation between the two scoring systems was found (r = –0.35; p < 0.001). Conclusion The present study describes the main methodological issues of HC assessment. Using a standardized protocol, both the qualitative and the quantitative scoring systems can be reliable.

Background: Ultrasound (US) is useful in monitoring RA patients, with the US7 score allowing grey-scale and power-Doppler (PD) semi-quantitative evaluation of synovitis and teno-synovitis. We evaluated real-life efficacy and safety of Baricitinib, an oral selective JAK1-2 inhibitor, in RA patients using clinical, clinimetric, and US assessments. Methods: Disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), visual analogue scale (VAS)-pain, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), COCHIN scale, adverse events (AE), concomitant medications, laboratory parameters, and US7 were performed/recorded at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months in RA patients starting Baricitinib. Responder/non-responder status was determined according to the EULAR Response Criteria at 3 months. SDAI clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) were calculated at 3 and 6 months. Results: In 43 enrolled patients, a significant improvement in disease activity and US7 components (except tendon PD) and a reduction of steroid dosage were observed. Responders at 3 months showed a significantly higher reduction of CDAI, SDAI, COCHIN scale, VAS-pain, and US7 synovialPD, compared with non-responders. At 3 and 6 months, remission/LDA was achieved by 12.8/53.8% and 21.6/51.3% patients, respectively. The csDMARD co-treatment was independently associated with remission/LDA at 3 months. Safety-related drop-outs were in line with literature data. The steroid dosage was associated with AE development at 6 months. Conclusion: The real-life data, also obtained with US evaluation, confirmed the Baricitinib efficacy in RA disease control, as well as the utility of assessment during the follow up of disease activity.

Background: Renal Resistive Index (RRI), reflects changes in both renal vascular and tubular-interstitial compartments and in systemic vascular compliance related to age and comorbidities. Objectives: a) To investigate determinants of RRI in SSc population, b) its association with SSc-related features and c) to test its prognostic impact on organ specific worsening or death. Methods: 380 SSc patients ≥18 years were enrolled after giving informed consent. Baseline data on RRI, laboratory, instrumental and therapeutic features were retrospectively collected. Age-SSc adjusted cut-offs were created by dividing the population in age quartiles and considering RRI values > 75th percentile as pathologic. Clinical follow-up was performed until last available visit or the development/worsening of specific internal organ involvement or death. Results: RRI was independently predicted by age and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure on Echo. Therefore, we created Age-SSc adjusted pathologic RRI cut-offs, which were significantly associated with various disease related skin and lung fibrotic manifestations, as well as vasculopathic complications. After a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.6 years, RRI was one of the independent predictors (together with modified Rodnan skin score, interstitial lung disease, presence of dyspnoea and late nailfold-videocapillaroscopy pattern) for mortality, with 0.68 as best cut-off (sensitivity 88.5%, specificity 50.9%). Conclusion:If corroborated, Renal Resistive Index cut-offs might be used to evaluate renal and extrarenal involvement in SSc and could serve as predictors of mortality.