Ventilatory capacity tests and standardized respiratory questionnaires were used in 1973 and in 1980 to measure the effect of mixed dust exposure in the asbestos cement industry on respiratory symptoms and lung function in 65 exposed workers and 30 controls (exposed to polyvinyl chloride but not to asbestos). Workers exposed to asbestos had 1) a higher prevalence of breathlessness and chest pain, and a higher incidence of breathlessness; 2) lower 1980 values of forced vital capacity (FVC) (0.27-0.83 liters) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) (0.23-0.62 liters); and 3) a faster decline (nearly 40 ml/year) in FVC and FEV1 between 1973 and 1980. The FVC annual decrease was 52.5 ml in the subjects with more than 15 years since first asbestos exposure, whereas it was 24.3 ml in those with less than 15 years, suggesting a faster decline after 15 years of exposure. The effect of asbestos exposure and smoking habits was less than additive as regards pulmonary function.

No abstract

No abstract

Asthma educational programs have been shown to reduce the use of emergency room, frequency of severe asthma attacks and hospitalization. However, its effectiveness in other morbidity parameters and on quality of life has yet to be fully understood. This prospective randomized control trial evaluated the effectiveness of a patient education program in 77 asthmatics according to "Teach Your Patients About Asthma: A Clinicians Guide" (1992). Forty asthmatic patientswere randomly allocated to Group A (usual treatment) and 37 to Group B (usual treatment plus a patient education program). The effectiveness of the educational program was evaluated by comparing morbidity outcomes at baseline and 3 months after initial evaluation. At enrolment, the two groups were not different with regard to age, sex, smoking, asthma severity atopy, FEV1, symptom-free days, use of rescue salbutamol and quality of life. Three months later, subjects in Group B showed a significant improvement in the overall quality of life (p < 0.01) and in the "Symptoms"domain (p < 0.01). None of the other parameters (use of rescue salbutamol, symptom-free days, days absent from work or school, FEV1) showed any significant change. After stratification for asthma severity, only subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma showed a significant improvement inthe overall qualityof life (p < 0.05) and in the "Symptoms" (p < 0.01) and 'Activities" (< 0.05) domains. Moreover, in subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma FEV1 value at the 3rd month of follow-up was higher in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the educational program improved the quality of life in asthratic subjects, mainly in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Asthma education programs result in clinical improvement. However, most studies involved programs of up to 1 year of follow-up, and their efficacy in improving quality of life (QoL) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a program of patient education in asthmatics over 2 years. Thirty-seven asthmatic patients were randomly allocated to group A (usual treatment) and 32 to group B (usual treatment plus patient education program). The effectiveness of the education program was evaluated by comparing morbidity outcomes at baseline and 12 and 24 months afterwards. At baseline, no intergroup difference emerged in age, sex, smoking, asthma severity, atopy, FEV1, symptom-free days, use of rescue salbutamol, and QoL. One year later, group B subjects had an improvement in the overall QoL (from 5.8 +/- 0.8 to 6.1 +/- 0.7, p < 0.005), and in "Activities" (from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 5.7 +/- 0.8, p < 0.05) and "Environment" (from 6.4 +/- 1.0 to 6.8 +/- 0.4, p < 0.05) domains. Two years later the "Activities" domain score increased in group B (from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 5.7 +/- 1.1, p < 0.05). QoL did not vary in group A. The education program was ineffective in all other parameters at both follow-up time-points. In group A, a significant increase in medication expenses and a significant decrease in rescue salbutamol use was found 1 and 2 years after baseline, respectively. In conclusion, this education program improved QoL for 1 year, but the improvement was not sustained in the 2nd year.