These data suggest that PICO allows faster and safe discharge by reducing the incidence of SSI and wound-related complications in selected patients undergoing surgical intervention for stricturing CD. This could be particularly useful in patients receiving steroids.

Surgical site events (SSE), including surgical wound complications and surgical site infections, are a major concern in patients undergoing general surgery operations. These increase the costs of care, and can lead to prolonged hospital stay and need for further treatments, ultimately resulting in poor quality of life. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been recently reported as a preventive strategy to avoid SSE, but little is known on the topic, and particularly in geriatric population. Our primary aim was to assess the efficacy of NPWT by means of a pocket device (PICO, Smith & Nephew, London, UK) in preventing SSE compared with conventional dressings in patients undergoing surgery with primary wound closure for breast and for colorectal diseases in our Unit. Our secondary aims were to assess the efficacy and safety of PICO in elderly patients, and to seek for differences between breast and abdominal results. All consecutive patients undergoing breast and colorectal surgery in our Unit between September 2012 and May 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this open label controlled study. Breast patients receiving NPWT were assigned to group B1, those receiving conventional dressings were assigned to group B2. Colorectal patients were assigned to group C1 (NPWT) and C2 (conventional dressings) in similar fashion. Each group included 25 patients, and at least 10 (40%) patients aged over 65 years to allow sub-analyses. NPWT significantly reduced SSE in both breast and colorectal patients compared with controls. No significant differences were observed according to age. Similar benefits were observed in breast and colorectal patients. Our results suggest that PICO is an effective tool to prevent SSE in patients undergoing general surgery, irrespective of age. Its use is recommended in frail, elderly patients at risk of SSE.

BackgroundRestorative proctocolectomy with ileopouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for intractable or complicated ulcerative colitis (UC). Debate exists concerning outcomes of IPAA in the elderly and literature data are scarce. We report our experience of IPAA in older population.MethodsWe gathered data on a prospective database of patients undergoing IPAA for UC over 70 years of age in our Unit from January 1990 through January 2010. Patients were compared with randomly selected younger controls on a 1:3 ratio. Patients underwent IPAA in 2 or 3 stages. Demographical data, disease characteristics, comorbidities, concomitant medications, peri-operative management, intra- and post-operative complications were analyzed. Function and quality of life were assessed by clinical visit and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire 1 and 3 years after ileostomy takedown.ResultsTwenty-seven elderly patients underwent IPAA for UC in the study period; these were compared with 81 younger controls. The former had more comorbidities and higher ASA score. All patients underwent loop-ileostomy closure. There were no differences between groups concerning the rate of major complications, but elderly patients more frequently had nuisances due to stoma output. Younger patients experienced significantly more episodes of small bowel obstruction. No significant differences in bowel control and health-related quality of life was observed, except for an higher rate of elderly patients taking antidiarrhoeals at 1-year follow-up; this observation was not confirmed at 3-year follow-up. A minimal decrease in continence was observed, but this did not affect overall satisfaction.ConclusionsIPAA can be safely offered to selected elderly UC patients who are strongly motivated and with no clinical disturbances of continence. In experienced hands no differences are likely to be expected concerning complications, quality of life and function. Results are stable with time and comparable to those of younger patients.