Aortic lymph node metastases are a relative common finding in locally advanced cervical cancer. Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred approach to perform para-aortic lymph nodal staging to reduce complications, hospital stay, and the time to primary treatment. This meta-analysis (CRD42022335095) aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of the two most advanced approaches for the aortic staging procedure: conventional laparoscopy (CL) versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL). The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search string included the following keywords: “Laparoscopy” (MeSH Unique ID: D010535), “Robotic Surgical Procedures” (MeSH Unique ID: D065287), “Lymph Node Excision” (MeSH Unique ID: D008197) and “Aorta” (MeSH Unique ID: D001011), and “Uterine Cervical Neoplasms” (MeSH Unique ID: D002583). A total of 1324 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 1200 patients were included in the CL group and 124 patients in the RAL group. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in CL compared with RAL (p = 0.02), whereas hospital stay was longer in RAL compared with CL (p = 0.02). We did not find significant difference for all the other parameters, including operative time, intra- and postoperative complication rate, and number of lymph nodes excised. Based on our data analysis, both CL and RAL are valid options for para-aortic staging lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Surgical demonstration of combined sacral plexus neurolysis and laparoscopic laterally extended endopelvic resection for deep lateral infiltrating endometriosis. Design: Video showing principles of neurolysis and laparoscopic laterally extended endopelvic resection applied to endometriotic surgery. Setting: University tertiary referral center. Deep infiltrating endometriosis is an underestimated disease with real medical and clinical issues, recently classified as central pelvic endometriosis and lateral pelvic endometriosis further divided into superficial and deep according to the structures' involvement [1]. The surgical removal of endometriotic foci remains the standard treatment. A wide knowledge of neuroanatomy and high skills in minimally invasive surgery are required to manage this challenging surgical scenario [2]. Interventions: New surgical approach for deep lateral infiltrating endometriosis based on the principles of lateral extended endopelvic resection and neuropelviologic surgery [3,4]. The patient was a 35-year-old woman, para 1, with neuropathic pain radiating to the left leg and a cyclic menstrual disorder. A laparoscopically assisted neuronavigation and subsequent neurolysis allowed the identification of the lateral nodule without damage to the autonomic pelvic innervation [1]. Then, a complete resection of the internal vascular compartment was required to obtain a radical endometriotic eradication. Shaving and bladder resection were also performed to complete removal of the endometriotic foci. Conclusion:The association of neuroanatomic knowledge and surgical oncologic principles applied to minimally invasive surgery should be considered to ensure an adequate surgical radicality and clinical benefit in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis.

and less expensive. Nevertheless, based on a 25% and 15% rate of false positivity and negativity respectively, consideration should be given to confirm MSI IHC status for all patients by molecular analyses.