Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent widely used in the management of liver transplant recipients. Cyclosporine has been shown to have antiviral activities against HIV, herpes simplex, and vaccinia viruses. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Cyclosporine in viral clearance in the liver transplant recipients during therapy with combination of interferon and ribavirin, and to determine the anti-viral potential of Cyclosporine in vitro. Immunosuppression consisted of either Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-based therapy. Both groups received therapy with interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks when evidence of progressive histologic disease was determined. We found that subjects on Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (n ϭ 56) had a higher sustained virological response of 46% compared to 27% in the patients on Tacrolimus-based therapy (nϭ59, P ϭ 0.03). In vitro studies were performed to evaluate the antiviral effect of Cyclosporine in the replicon system. These studies showed that Cyclosporine inhibits hepatitis C viral replication in a dose-dependent manner. Combination of Cyclosporine with interferon showed additive effect, and its function is independent of interferon signaling pathways. In conclusion, Cyclosporine may offer an advantage to Tacrolimus in those patients undergoing interferon-based therapy and should be studied in a prospective randomized trial. Liver Transpl 12: 51-57, 2006.

ObjectiveDue to a high efficacy in clinical trials, sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 16 weeks is recommended for treatment of patients with HCV genotype (GT) 2 infection. We investigated safety and effectiveness of these regimens for GT2 in HCV-TARGET participants.DesignHCV-TARGET, an international, prospective observational study evaluates clinical practice data on novel antiviral therapies at 44 academic and 17 community medical centres in North America and Europe. Clinical data were centrally abstracted from medical records. Selection of treatment regimen and duration was the investigator's choice. The primary efficacy outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12).ResultsBetween December 2013 and April 2015, 321 patients completed 12 weeks (n=283) or 16 weeks (n=38) of treatment with SOF and RBV. Prior treatment experience and cirrhosis was more frequent among patients in the 16-week regimen compared with 12 weeks (52.6% vs 27.6% and 63.2% vs 21.9%, respectively). Overall, SVR12 was 88.2%. The SVR12 in patients without cirrhosis was 91.0% and 92.9% for 12 or 16 weeks of therapy, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis treated for 12 or 16 weeks, SVR12 was 79.0% and 83%. In the multivariate analysis, liver cirrhosis, lower serum albumin and RBV dose at baseline were significantly associated with SVR12. Common adverse events (AEs) included fatigue, anaemia, nausea, headache, insomnia, rash and flu-like symptoms. Discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 2.8%.ConclusionsIn this clinical practice setting, SOF and RBV was safe and effective for treatment of patients with HCV GT2 infection.Trial registration numberNCT01474811.

Background Recurrent infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation is associated with decreased graft and patient survival. Achieving sustained virological response (SVR) with antiviral therapy improves survival. Because interferon-based therapy has limited efficacy and is poorly tolerated, there has been rapid transition to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens. Herein the experience with DAAs in the treatment of post-transplant genotype 1HCV from a consortium of community and academic centers (HCV TARGET) is described. Methods Twenty-one of the 54 centers contributing to the HCV TARGET consortium participated in this study. Enrollment criteria included positive post-transplant HCV RNA prior to treatment, HCV genotype 1, and documentation of use of a simeprevir/sofosbuvir (SMV/SOF) containing DAA regimen. Safety and efficacy were assessed. SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 64 days or later after cessation of treatment. Results A total of 162 patients enrolled in HCV-TARGET started treatment with SMV/SOF with or without ribavirin following liver transplantation. The study population included 151 patients treated with these regimens for whom outcomes and safety data were available. The majority of the 151 patients were treated with sofosbuvir and simeprevir alone (n=119, 78%) or with ribavirin (n=32, 22%), The duration of therapy was 12 weeks for most patients, although 15 patients received 24 weeks of treatment. Of all patients receiving SOF/SIM +/− Ribavirin, 133/151 (88%) achieved SVR12 and 11 relapsed (7%). One patient had virologic breakthrough (n=1) and 6 patients were lost to post treatment follow up. Serious adverse events occurred in 12%; 3 patients (all cirrhotic) died due to aspiration pneumonia, suicide, and multi-organ failure. One experienced liver transplant rejection. Conclusions Interferon-free DAA treatment represents a major improvement over prior interferon-based therapy. Broader application of these and other emerging DAA regimens in the treatment of post-transplant hepatitis C is warranted.

SUMMARY Background Standard of practice involves using transarterial therapy for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) alone and sorafenib only for more advanced HCC, but the sorafenib and transarterial therapy combination may provide greater efficacy. Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy in HCC. Methods Consecutive cases of HCC were treated with sorafenib and transarterial therapy, receiving sorafenib 2 to 4 weeks before transarterial therapy. Baseline clinical parameters, adverse events (AEs) and survival were collected. Results A total of 47 patients received sorafenib and transarterial therapy. The majority of the patients were male (70%) with HCV (60%), median age of 60 years, good performance status (0–1), stable cirrhosis (Child: A 72%; B 28%), unresectable turnour (stage: B 81%; C 19%) and median AFP of 24 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 12 months and median time on sorafenib was 6 months. LC Bead TACE was used with a median frequency of 3. The majority of the patients (89%) experienced AEs. The most common AEs were fatigue (51%), hand-foot skin reaction (51%) and diarrhoea (43%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs included fatigue (13%) and hand-foot skin reaction (26%). Most patients required a dose reduction (66%). The main AE related to transarterial therapy was post-TACE syndrome (23%). The disease control rate was 68% at 6 months. Overall median survival rate was 18.5 months (95% CI 16.1–20.9 months). Conclusion Concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy is overall safe with no unexpected side effects and encouraging efficacy that warrants further study.

The aim of the present study was to determine the treatment outcome and prognostic factors for survival in patients with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with ICC between 2000 and 2009 at a single institution. We identified a total of 105 patients with ICC. Among them, 63.8% were older than 60 years of age, 50.5% were male and 88.6% were Caucasian. By preoperative imaging approximately half of the patients (50.5%) were surgical candidates and underwent resection. The other half of the patients (49.5%) were unresectable. The unresectable group received chemoradiotherapy (53%) and transarterial chemoembolization (7.7%) as palliative treatments while 23.0% of the patients (12/52) received best supportive care alone. The median survival rates were 16.1 months (13.1–19.2) for the entire cohort, 27.6 months (17.7–37.6) for curative resection, 12.9 months (6.5–19.2) for palliative chemoradiotherapy and 4.9 months (0.4–9.6) for best supportive care (P<0.001). Independent predictors on multivariate analysis were advanced stage at diagnosis and treatment received. In those patients who underwent resection, advanced AJCC stage and presence of microvascular invasion were also independent predictors of poor survival. We concluded that surgery offers the most beneficial curative option and outcome, emphasizing the importance of resectability as a major prognostic factor. The present study also revealed that use of chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting failed to improve survival but its palliative use in those patients with unresectable ICC offered a modest survival advantage over best supportive care. The overriding factors influencing outcome were stage and the presence of microvascular invasion on pathology.