BACKGROUND. The authors evaluated their long‐term experience with combined‐modality, conservative treatment in patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. METHODS. In total, 121 patients with T2, T3, or T4 bladder cancer (mean age, 63 years; ratio of men to women, 3:1) underwent induction by transurethral resection (TUR) of the tumor and received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (RT) (n = 43 patients) or radiochemotherapy (RCT) (n = 78 patients). Six weeks after RT or RCT, responses were evaluated by restaging TUR. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) were observed at regular intervals. In patients who had persistent or recurrent invasive tumor, further treatment was recommended. RESULTS. Local response evaluation by restaging TUR was possible in 119 patients, and 102 of those patients (85.7%) achieved a CR. After a median follow‐up of 66 months (range, 6–182 months), no local or distant disease recurrences were observed in 67 of 102 complete responders (65.7%), 17 of 102 complete responders (16.7%) experienced superficial local disease recurrence, and 18 of 102 complete responders (17.6%) had a muscle‐invasive relapse. The 5‐year tumor‐specific, overall, and bladder‐intact survival rates were 73.5%, 67.7%, and 51.2%, respectively. Treatment modality, tumor classification, and resection status after initial TUR had an impact on survival rates (P = .04, P = .02, and P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS. The current results indicated that conservative combined treatment is a reasonable alternative to radical cystectomy in selected patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 2008. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.

In many reported malignant cases, the histology of the tumour cells suggested that they were malignant, yet the clinical course has been benign. Carefully reviewing the literature, it seems that actually we have enough histological criteria to identify the cases with biological adverse outcome. Those unfortunate cases behave as high grade sarcomas and therefore may deserve an aggressive therapeutic treatment.

Objectives: Adjuvant treatment for stage III endometrial cancer is not yet defined. Previous experiences support the usefulness of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the outcome in a cohort of patients with stage III endometrial cancer treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with stage III endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2009 was conducted. The impact on relapse-free survival of clinical and pathological variables and adjuvant treatment received was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Eighty-two patients were considered. Median age was 62 years (range 38–82). Seventy-eight (95%) patients received an adjuvant treatment: chemotherapy (41; 50%), radiotherapy (18; 22%), or combined chemo-radiotherapy (19; 23%). Four patients were excluded from analysis because they were not treated with any adjuvant therapy. At univariate analysis, tumor grade (G3 vs. G1–G2; p = 0.003) was associated with risk of recurrence; similarly, patients treated with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.031, hazard ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.86) or chemotherapy alone (p = 0.053, hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.29–1.01) had a significantly higher risk for relapse, compared to those treated with the multimodality approach. Relapse-free survival at 3 years was 86.5, 65.8 and 44.1%, with the multimodality approach, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively. At multivariable analysis, age and grading were independently associated with recurrence-free survival. Hazard ratio for relapse-free survival was 0.14 (95% CI 0.02–1.04) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.04–1.11) for multimodality treatment compared to chemotherapy alone and radiotherapy alone, respectively. Conclusions: Age and grading are independent prognostic factors. A combined approach with radiotherapy and chemotherapy may induce an advantage in relapse-free survival compared to radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Prospective clinical trials are needed to verify this clinical hypothesis.

Bone metastases are commonly observed in oncologic patients with advanced disease. These metastases are considered the main cause of neoplastic pain, with more than half of oncologic patients experiencing neoplastic pain during the course of the disease due to bone involvement. Lung, breast, and prostate cancers are the primary causes of bone metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, is the focus of our research, as it has been proven to be an optimal predictive index to assess the radiation treatment in many patients. We included patients treated with standard fractioning of radiation therapy. First, we examined the irradiated lesions with the MRI-DWI technique, before treatment and 30 and 60 days after its completion. Then we combined the MRI results and clinical parameters in a table with a predictive score for the quality of life in patients with bone metastases. This was a significant predictor of the efficacy of radiation treatment, from both clinical and psychological points of view, as it can allow an early assessment of the response to RT and therefore better scheduling of the next therapeutic steps to be performed. The table of the score we proposed helped guide patient monitoring, enabling us to undertake, where possible, follow-up with therapeutic strategies tailored to each patient's needs.