Endoscopes can be stored for seven days if they have been effectively reprocessed and appropriately stored. Ongoing surveillance cultures are necessary to verify reprocessing effectiveness.

No abstract

Background: This quasi-experimental study explored full-time nurse faculty competency in genomics and genetics using a validated measure prior to and following educational sessions during one academic semester. The findings represent the researchers' efforts to educate nurse faculty and to support their competency in genomics and genetics as information shared with students is only as robust as faculty knowledge. Methods: Faculty who consented to participate completed the Genomic Nurse Concept Inventory (GNCI©) to measure their knowledge of the concepts surrounding genomics and genetics prior to the education intervention and then following all three education sessions. The education sessions were carried out over a semester using a lunch and learn forum. Results: Our first assumption was that 50% of faculty would score below 70% on the pretest. Eligible nurse faculty 29/48 (60%) completed the GNCI and scores show they had limited knowledge in three areas: nomenclature of genes and gene function, inheritance patterns, and the clinical application of genomics to human disease. Over half of nurse faculty 17/29 (59%) scored less than 70% on the GNCI© supporting our first assumption. The second assumption that over 85% of faculty would score at least 70% on the GNCI© after the education was not supported. The education sessions improved scores on the GNCI© in the 12/29 (41%) faculty who completed the measures prior to and after the intervention. Conclusion: Despite the growing knowledge about genomics/genetics and the application to clinical practice, health professionals like nurses are not competent in these concepts. Nursing faculty require competency in genomics and genetics in order to integrate these concepts in nursing curricula. Outcomes of this project show the need to provide education and support for nurse faculty in genomics and genetics.

The aim of this multisite study (N = 412) was to identify which colon-cleansing preparations used before colonoscopy work best with specific patient populations. A comparative, descriptive approach was used to (1) describe bowel-cleansing preparations being used across the United States, (2) compare their cleansing effectiveness and tolerability, and (3) compare their effectiveness in patients with various health characteristics. A descriptive demographic data form adapted from the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates Minimum Data Set was used to collect baseline information, identify preprocedure instructions, and describe compliance with preparations. Subjects completed an 11-item subject experience with the bowel-cleansing form before their colonoscopy. A colon cleanliness scale was completed during the colonoscopy to evaluate the effectiveness of the preparation. The preparations revealed a "good" to "excellent" rating and there was no statistical difference in the cleansing effectiveness of the preparations. Subjects experienced a variety of discomforts. Future studies that involve the pooling of data from multiple sites in different geographical areas may provide more precise criteria for the selection of colon-cleansing preparation for specific patients and increase the cultural diversity of the sample.