This research examined how implicit attitudes are associated with cognitive processing and selfreported evaluation of advertisements featuring same-sex couples. Hypotheses were posited using the theoretical framework of Social Identity Theory (Tajfel and Turner 1986) and perspectives on implicit attitudes. In Study 1 participants watched and evaluated 10 television advertisements while physiological measures of cognitive and affective processing were collected. Ads varied such that half used same-sex couples as protagonists while the other half used other-sex couples. Participants demonstrated less positive responses to ads featuring samesex couples. Physiological and self-reported responses were associated with implicit attitudes toward homosexuality; negative implicit attitudes were associated with more negative affect, less attention, less positivity, and less liking to ads featuring same-sex couples. Two subsequent studies replicated these findings in non-student samples, indicating that participants preferred ads with other-sex couples (Study 2) and that implicit attitudes were associated with this response (Study 3). This research suggests that implicit attitudes affect processing and evaluation of ads featuring same-sex couples in ways unaccounted for by explicitly-measured attitudes. Results are discussed in terms of advancing theory, furthering understanding of the dynamic processing of ads featuring in-group and out-group members, and practical implications.
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a psychophysiological technique used to measure electrical activity in the brain. Of value to communication researchers, event related potentials (ERPs) are time‐locked responses that allow for the indexing of complex cognitive processing of stimuli. Also of interest are systematic frequency band fluctuations in EEG waveforms that are indicative of cognitive processes. This entry aims to describe recording practices and to provide context and support for the use of EEG, ERPs, and frequency activity in media research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.