The basal phenotype of breast carcinoma was demonstrated from a study of gene expression profiles, which demonstrated five carcinoma phenotypes with differing immunohistologic profiles and outcomes. The basal phenotype, so-named because of an immunohistologic profile that is similar to myoepithelial cells of the breast, has poor outcomes. While the invasive basal phenotype has been described, there is a paucity of literature regarding the existence or recognition of a precursor lesion. We searched our CoPath database for breast carcinomas in the age group of 37 years or less, and this yielded 98 cases from the years 2001 to April 2006. Pathology reports were screened for those cases that were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER-2/neu (triple negative). A total of 16 cases (16/98, 16%) fulfilled these criteria. Histology was reviewed and immunostains were performed for Cytokeratins 14, 17, and 5/6, vimentin, EGFR, c-kit, smooth muscle actin and p63. All 16 cases had a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma, Nottingham score 9/9, with geographic necrosis, good circumscription and lymphoid infiltrates. Of the 16 cases, 13 exhibited at least one area of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The DCIS types were solid, flat or micropapillary, high nuclear grade, with comedonecrosis and invariably associated with intense lymphoid inflammatory cell infiltration. Of 16 invasive cases, 14 (88%) were positive for CK14, CK17, CK5/6 and EGFR; 94% were vimentin positive, while half or less of cases were positive for smooth muscle actin, c-kit or p63. All of the DCIS components demonstrated the same immunohistologic profile as the invasive component. A DCIS component of solid, flat or micropapillary type exists in the basal phenotype of breast carcinoma, and it demonstrates the same immunophenotype as the invasive carcinoma, typically positive for CK5/6, CK14, CK17, vimentin and EGFR, but negative for ER/PR and HER-2/neu.
Columnar cell lesions of the breast include a morphologic spectrum of simple columnar cell change, columnar cell hyperplasia, columnar cell hyperplasia with atypia and ductal carcinoma in situ of micropapillary/cribriform type. Invasive carcinomas of low grade are often seen in association with this spectrum. The biologic significance of these lesions that are commonly found on breast biopsies is unknown. Three cases of formalinfixed, paraffin-embedded breast tissues, each displaying the entire spectrum of columnar cell lesions through ductal carcinoma in situ and including foci of invasive carcinoma were microdissected at multiple sites to evaluate neoplasia progression. Minute tissue targets were microdissected (4-8/case) from unstained 4-lm thick recut paraffin sections and included non-neoplastic breast and sites of columnar cell change, hyperplasia, atypia, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. Allelic imbalance for a broad panel of microsatellite markers in proximity to known tumor suppressor genes was quantitated using automated polymerase chain reaction/gel electrophoresis. Genomic loci evaluated 1p, 3p, 5q, 9p, 9q, 10q, 17p, 17q, 19q, 22q. The presence, topographic relationship and time course of mutational damage was correlated with columnar morphologic features. Detailed allelic imbalance information was obtained from each microdissection tissue target producing a detailed fingerprint of mutational damage in each case. Allelic damage was targeted predominately at 9q, 10q, 17p and 17q. Simple columnar cell change was without mutational changes and only present in one case of columnar cell hyperplasia. The remainder of the cases all show progressive accumulation of allelic damage in columnar cell changes with atypia, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. The fractional mutation percentage increased progressively from columnar cell hyperplasia through invasive carcinoma. Low level of allelic imbalance was demonstrable in columnar cell lesions by the microdissection approach. A gradient of progressive mutational change could be delineated in each case manifesting allelic loss damage. Allelic loss damage appeared to preferentially target loci at 9q, 10q, 17p and 17q. The findings are consonant with the hypothesis that a select group of atypical columnar cell lesions are morphologic precursors to invasive carcinoma. Integrated molecular pathology analysis used here can help define the significance of columnar cell lesions and its role in breast cancer tumorigenesis on an individual patient basis.
Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) is a more recently characterized entity that mimics high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). PLCIS is sometimes treated similar to high-grade DCIS, but no consensus has been reached for the most appropriate treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the histologic and immunohistologic profile of pure PLCIS on core needle biopsies and present follow-up clinical data. We reviewed 12 cases of pure PLCIS diagnosed on core needle biopsies of the breast along with subsequent surgical resections. Histologically, all cases showed dyscohesive cells with grade 3 nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and moderate to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. A panel of immunohistochemical stains to study this entity included E-cadherin, P120 catenin, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptors, HER2/neu, and Ki-67 (MIB-1). Residual PLCIS was found on excisional biopsies in 83% (10/12) cases. Invasive lobular carcinoma was found in 25% (3/12) cases. The lobular nature of all cases was confirmed by negative E-cadherin and cytoplasmic-dominant staining with P120 catenin. PLCIS was positive for estrogen receptor in 92% (11/12); progesterone receptor in 50% (6/12), and Her2/neu was positive in 25% (3/12). A moderate to high proliferation activity was observed with MIB (Ki-67) staining in 92% (11/12) cases. We conclude that PLCIS has a lobular immunostaining pattern for P120 catenin and E-cadherin indicating disruption of the E-cadherin/P120 catenin complex. This entity has aggressive parameters similar to high-grade DCIS including grade 3 nuclei, high Ki-67 (MIB-1) index, and HER2/neu positivity. PLCIS has a significant association with other high-risk lesions and invasive lobular carcinoma.
Rationale and Objectives. To compare the sensitivities of ultrasound guided core biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) for detection of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a current diagnosis of ipsilateral breast cancer. Materials and Methods. From December 2008 to December 2010, 105 patients with breast cancer and abnormal appearing lymph nodes in the ipsilateral axilla consented to undergo FNA of an axillary node immediately followed by core biopsy of the same node, both with ultrasound guidance. Experienced pathologists evaluated the aspirate cytology without knowledge of the core histology. Cytology and core biopsy results were compared to sentinel node excision or axillary dissection pathology. Sensitivities were compared using McNemar's test. Results. Of 70 patients with axillary node metastases, FNA was positive in 55/70 (78.6%) and core was positive in 61/70 (87.1%) (P = 0.18). The FNA and core results were discordant in 14/70 (20%) patients. Ten cases were FNA negative/core positive. Four cases were FNA positive/core negative. Conclusion. Core biopsy detected six (8.6%) more cases of metastatic lymphadenopathy than FNA but the difference in sensitivities was not statistically significant. Core biopsy should be considered if the node is clearly imaged and readily accessible. FNA is a good alternative when a smaller needle is desired due to node location or other patient factors. This trial is registered with NCT01920139.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.