An unusual isolate from a human leg wound was identified as Xenorhabdus luminescens. This finding led to the discovery or isolation of four additional strains, two from blood and two from wounds. Three of the five strains were from patients in San Antonio, Tex. Three strains were studied by DNA-DNA hybridization (SI nuclease-trichloroacetic acid method) and were 77 to 100% related to each other, 34% related to the type strain of X. luminescens, 35 to 40% related to three of Grimont's other DNA hybridization groups of X. luminescens, and 9% related to the type strain of Xenorhabdus nematophilus. The new group of five strains was designated X. luminescens DNA hybridization group 5. All five strains were very inactive biochemically and fermented only D-glucose and D-mannose. The key reactions for recognizing this new organism are yellow pigment production, negative test for nitrate reduction to nitrite, weak bioluminescence (10 to 15 min of dark adaptation is required to see the weak light produced), and a unique hemolytic reaction on sheep blood agar plates incubated at 25°C. Two case histories of strains from wounds are given; these suggest that X. luminescens DNA hybridization group 5 may be a new bacterial agent that causes wound infections. The two cases of wound infection, along with the two blood isolates, suggest that the new organism is clinically significant. Organisms from unusual sources can occasionally occur in clinical specimens (9). This is not unusual if the organism is found in a broad ecological niche such as soil or water. Organisms that occupy a limited niche, such as Serratia

Simultaneous outbreaks of Shigella sonnei gastroenteritis occurred in October 1983 at two Texas university campuses 60 miles (96 km) apart. There were no common food handlers, recreational activities, water sources or swimming areas to explain the introduction of Shigella at both campuses. However, tossed salads were found to be associated with illness at both campuses. The investigation disclosed that both schools had received produce shipments from the same company during the week preceding these outbreaks. Shigella isolates from cases at both universities, sent to the Centers for Disease Control for plasmid analysis and colicin typing, were found to be identical. The same organism was evidently not a frequent cause of shigellosis within a 160-mile (256 km) radius of these universities since only 19% of control isolates chosen from this area were identical to the type which caused these outbreaks. This is the first report of two related outbreaks of shigellosis that were caused by a contaminated food source and not by a food handler. Simultaneous foodborne outbreaks of shigellosis should trigger a search for potential contamination at every step of food handling from farm to kitchen.

We report the isolation in the United States of Vibriofluvialis from the stools of a patient who had severe watery diarrhea without fever and who subsequently died. V. fluvialis, a known enteric pathogen in other parts of the world, should be suspected in patients with watery diarrhea, especially in coastal areas. Vibriofluvialis is a newly described halophilic Vibrio species (6) that has been isolated from the stools of over 500 patients with diarrhea at the Cholera Research Laboratory in Bangladesh (now the International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh) during a 9-month period in 1976 and 1977 (5). It has also been detected in the stools of persons with diarrhea in Jordan, Yugoslavia (6), and Bahrain (3). In the United States, the organism has been isolated from a wound of a patient in Hawaii, from water and sediment in the New York bay (8), from shellfish in Louisiana, and from water and shellfish in Pacific Northwest estuaries (D. L. Tison,

No abstract