The diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) remains challenging and subjective in some cases, with variable histologic criteria and differences of opinion among gynecologic pathologists, potentially leading to under/overtreatment. There has been growing interest in the use of specific immunohistochemical markers as adjuncts in AH/EIN diagnosis. For example, the World Health Organization 2020 Classification specifies that loss of Pten, Pax2, or mismatch repair proteins are desirable diagnostic criteria. Other markers, most notably β-catenin and Ari-d1a, are also aberrantly expressed in some AH/EIN. However, the performance of some markers individually-and more importantly as a group-has not been rigorously explored, raising questions as to which marker(s) or combination(s) is the most effective in practice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from AH/EIN cases (n = 111) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for 6 markers: Pax2, Pten, Mlh1, β-catenin, Arid1a, and p53. Aberrant expression was tabulated for each case and marker. An additional set of normal endometria (n = 79) was also analyzed to define optimal diagnostic criteria for marker aberrance. The performance characteristics of each marker, the entire panel, and subsets thereof were quantitatively and statistically analyzed. In order of number of cases detected, the most frequently aberrant markers in AH/EIN were Pax2 (81.1% of cases), Pten (50.5%), β-catenin (47.7%), Arid1a (7.2%), Mlh1 (4.5%), and p53 (2.7%). The majority of cases showed aberrant expression of ≥ 2 markers. All 6 markers together identified 92.8% of cases. Arid1a, Mlh1, and p53 were robust and readily scored markers, but all cases showing aberrant expression of these 3 markers were also detected by Pax2, Pten, or β-catenin. A focused panel of only 3 markers (Pax2, Pten, and β-catenin) showed optimal performance characteristics as a diagnostic adjunct in the histopathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN. Use of this panel is practicable and robust, with at least 1 of the 3 markers being aberrant in 92.8% of AH/EIN.

The prevalence and significance of programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression in different types of tubo-ovarian carcinoma have not been well defined. We evaluated PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density in whole tissue sections of 189 cases of tubo-ovarian carcinoma, including high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, n=100), clear cell carcinoma (CCC, n=24), endometrioid carcinoma (EmC, n=40), and mucinous carcinomas (MC, n=25). Using the tumor proportion score (TPS) with a 1% cutoff, PD-L1 expression was present in 21% of HGSC, 16.7% of CCC, 2.5% of EmC, and 4% of MC. Using the combined positive score (CPS) with a cutoff of 1, PD-L1 expression was present in 48% of HGSC, 25% of CCC, 20% of EmC, and 24% of MC. HGSC demonstrated significantly higher CD8+ TIL density than CCC (P=0.013238), EmC (P=0.01341), or MC (P=0.004556). In HGSC, CD8+ TIL density was directly correlated with PD-L1 positivity using either TPS (P=0.0008) or CPS (P=0.00011). Survival analysis of patients with high stage (stage III to IV) HGSC revealed PD-L1 positivity by TPS to be associated with improved progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.4912 vs. 2.036, P=0.0378). Although not statistically significant, a similar trend was observed in overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.3387 vs. 2.953, P=0.0548). In contrast, with CPS, no significant difference was identified between PD-L1-positive and negative groups in either progression-free survival (P=0.5086) or overall survival (P=0.7823). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with higher PD-L1 expression by TPS (P=0.00407) but not CPS. No significant difference in PD-L1 expression was detected in tumors from patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations compared with germline mutation-negative tumors by either TPS or CPS. In conclusion, the prevalence of PD-L1 expression is variable in different types of tubo-ovarian carcinoma and is highest in HGSC. In high-stage HGSC, PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells is associated with an increased immune response and improved survival.

Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) is routinely performed in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Currently, no screening recommendations exist for LS in precancerous lesions. The study goal was to determine the incidence of abnormal protein expression in endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia/atypical hyperplasia (EIN/AH). We analyzed mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression by immunohistochemistry in EIN/AH concurrent with MMR-deficient endometrial carcinomas, and in endometrial biopsy/curettage specimens with EIN/AH from an unselected group of patients. Of 63 patients with MMR-deficient endometrial carcinoma, 34 demonstrated loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression; 1 showed loss of PMS2 alone; 12 showed loss of MSH2/MSH6, and 15 had loss of MSH6 alone. Genetic testing identified deleterious mutations in 14 cases (LS). 15 tumors demonstrated MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. Abnormal MMR expression in EIN/AH and adjacent carcinoma was concordant in 100% of LS cases and 71% of MLH1 promoter hypermethylation cases. Of 118 patients from the unselected group with EIN/AH, 4 (3%) cases demonstrated absent expression of one or more MMR proteins. Of these, 2 patients were later confirmed to have deleterious mutations in subsequent specimens with endometrial carcinoma. The prevalence of abnormal MMR expression in EIN/AH adjacent to carcinoma and in the unselected group of patients with EIN/AH is similar to the reported prevalence of LS in endometrial carcinoma. Identifying patients at high risk for LS through abnormal MMR expression in EIN/AH provides the benefit of early surveillance, treatment and timely diagnosis for the patient and affected family members.

The pattern-based classification system of endocervical adenocarcinoma correlates with nodal metastasis and clinical outcomes, but its application in biopsies is challenging. The aim of this study was the correlation of additional histologic features with patterns of invasion as well as prognosis. A total of 103 specimens from 71 cervical adenocarcinoma cases were studied. Among the 71 cases, all had resection specimens including hysterectomy, cold knife cone excision or loop electrosurgical excision procedure excision, and 32 of these had prior cervical biopsies. We applied the pattern-based classification system to all the specimens and evaluated histopathologic features microscopically. Findings in biopsies were compared with their corresponding resections and correlated with nodal status and disease stage. In 71 resection specimens, pattern A was present in 10 (14.1%), pattern B in 12 (16.9%), and pattern C in 49 (69%) cases. Of the 32 cervical biopsies, pattern of invasion could be classified in only 16 (50%) cases, including 1 (6%) with pattern A, 4 (25%) with pattern B, and 11 (69%) with pattern C. Of the 32 cervical biopsies, 30 could be evaluated for intraluminal necrotic/tumor debris and/or grade 3 nuclei, which correlated with pattern C as well as with lymph node metastasis in the subsequent staging specimens. No tumor with patterns A or B had intraluminal necrotic/tumor debris or grade 3 nuclei in either biopsy or resection specimens. Therefore, intraluminal necrotic/tumor debris and grade 3 nuclei are highly predictive histologic features for cervical adenocarcinomas with pattern C invasion and nodal metastasis.