The mouse vaginal epithelium cyclically exhibits cell proliferation and differentiation in response to estrogen. Estrogen acts as an activator of mTOR signaling but its role in vaginal epithelial homeostasis is unknown. We analyzed reproductive tract-specific Rptor or Rictor conditional knockout mice to reveal the role of mTOR signaling in estrogen-dependent vaginal epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Loss of Rptor but not Rictor in the vagina resulted in an aberrant proliferation of epithelial cells and failure of keratinized differentiation. As gene expression analysis indicated, several estrogen-mediated genes, including Pgr and Ereg (EGF-like growth factor) were not induced by estrogen in Rptor cKO mouse vagina. Moreover, supplementation of EREG could activate the proliferation and survival of vaginal epithelial cells through YAP1 in the absence of Rptor. Thus, mTORC1 signaling integrates estrogen and growth factor signaling to mediate vaginal epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation, providing new insights into vaginal atrophy treatment for post-menopausal women.

Negative genetic regulators of phenotypic heterogeneity, or phenotypic capacitors/stabilizers, elevate population average fitness by limiting deviation from the optimal phenotype and increase the efficacy of natural selection by enhancing the phenotypic differences among genotypes. Stabilizers can presumably be switched off to release phenotypic heterogeneity in the face of extreme or fluctuating environments to ensure population survival. This task could, however, also be achieved by positive genetic regulators of phenotypic heterogeneity, or “phenotypic diversifiers,” as shown by recently reported evidence that a bacterial divisome factor enhances antibiotic resistance. We hypothesized that such active creation of phenotypic heterogeneity by diversifiers, which is functionally independent of stabilizers, is more common than previously recognized. Using morphological phenotypic data from 4,718 single-gene knockout strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we systematically identified 324 stabilizers and 160 diversifiers and constructed a bipartite network between these genes and the morphological traits they control. Further analyses showed that, compared with stabilizers, diversifiers tended to be weaker and more promiscuous (regulating more traits) regulators targeting traits unrelated to fitness. Moreover, there is a general division of labor between stabilizers and diversifiers. Finally, by incorporating NCI-60 human cancer cell line anticancer drug screening data, we found that human one-to-one orthologs of yeast diversifiers/stabilizers likely regulate the anticancer drug resistance of human cancer cell lines, suggesting that these orthologs are potential targets for auxiliary treatments. Our study therefore highlights stabilizers and diversifiers as the genetic regulators for the bidirectional control of phenotypic heterogeneity as well as their distinct evolutionary roles and functional independence.

The secondary structure is a fundamental feature of both non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). However, our understanding of the secondary structures of mRNAs, especially those of the coding regions, remains elusive, likely due to translation and the lack of RNA-binding proteins that sustain the consensus structure like those binding to ncRNAs. Indeed, mRNAs have recently been found to adopt diverse alternative structures, but the overall functional significance remains untested. We hereby approach this problem by estimating the folding specificity, i.e., the probability that a fragment of an mRNA folds back to the same partner once refolded. We show that the folding specificity of mRNAs is lower than that of ncRNAs and exhibits moderate evolutionary conservation. Notably, we find that specific rather than alternative folding is likely evolutionarily adaptive since specific folding is frequently associated with functionally important genes or sites within a gene. Additional analysis in combination with ribosome density suggests the ability to modulate ribosome movement as one potential functional advantage provided by specific folding. Our findings reveal a novel facet of the RNA structurome with important functional and evolutionary implications and indicate a potential method for distinguishing the mRNA secondary structures maintained by natural selection from molecular noise.

Secondary structure is a fundamental feature for both noncoding and messenger RNA.However, our understandings about the secondary structure of mRNA, especially for the coding regions, remain elusive, likely due to translation and the lack of RNA binding proteins that sustain the consensus structure, such as those bind to noncoding RNA. Indeed, mRNA has recently been found to bear pervasive alternative structures, whose overall evolutionary and functional significance remained untested.We hereby approached this problem by estimating folding specificity, the probability that a fragment of RNA folds back to the same partner once re-folded. We showed that folding specificity for mRNA is lower than noncoding RNA, and displays moderate evolutionary conservation between orthologs and between paralogs. More importantly, we found that specific rather than alternative folding is more likely evolutionarily adaptive, since it is more frequently associated with functionally important genes or sites within a gene. Additional analysis in combination with ribosome density suggests the capability of modulating ribosome movement as one potential functional advantage provided by specific folding. Our findings revealed a novel facet of RNA structome with important functional and evolutionary implications, and points to a potential way of disentangling mRNA secondary structures maintained by natural selection from molecular noise.