Background: Volar locking plates have provided the capability to repair both simple and complex fractures. However, complications related to the inability to fix or to maintain the fixation of some fracture patterns have been reported with volar locking plates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of dorsal plating treatment for specific pattern of fractures. Methods: Patients with distal radius fractures were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria for this study were those related to the patient and treatment (adult patients, internal fixation with dorsal plating, a minimum follow-up of 12 months), and those related to the fracture pattern (displaced central articular fragment, volar distal fracture line not enough to allow volar fixation, displaced dorsal-ulnar fragment, dorsal partial fractures, combination of these patterns). Clinical outcome information including active range of motion, radiographs, PRWE and DASH questionnaires were collected. Complications were recorded. Results: During a 6-year period, 679 distal radius fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Of these, 27 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were examined at a median of 34 months’ follow-up. All but pronation, supination, and radial deviation had a statistically significant difference compared to the opposite side. The median score on the DASH was 4.5 and 3.2 on the PRWE. No patient suffered loss of reduction during the follow-up nor were tendon ruptures recorded. Conclusions: Although most of the distal radius fractures can be treated with volar locking plates, almost 5% of them present specific patterns that are amenable to treatment with dorsal fixation, without postoperative loss of reduction. These specific patterns are: (1) displaced central articular fragment, (2) volar distal fracture with less of 1cm distance from the distal volar edge of the radius, (3) displaced dorso-ulnar fragment, (4) Barton’s fracture, (5) combination of these patterns.
Summary:The medial femoral condyle vascularized graft has become a useful resource in reconstructive microsurgery due to the rate of bony union, and the low rate of complication. We report osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle in a 65-year-old woman after harvesting a corticocancellous medial femoral condyle graft to treat a tarsometatarsal nonunion. We were not able to define whether a vascular or mechanical disorder could be the ultimate cause. However, because of the severity of the complication, we suggest informing patients who will undergo a medial femoral condyle flap about this infrequent complication.
Introduction: The aim of this paper is to report a rare case of a child who suffered a simple elbow dislocation (SED) that developed a post-traumatic valgus deformity and a subsequent posterolateral elbow instability. Case Report: We report a case of a female patient who suffered a posterolateral SED of her elbow at the age of 12. She was treated with closed reduction and over the years, she developed an asymptomatic valgus deformity. At the age of 16, she suffered a fall trauma while playing field hockey with a re-dislocation of the elbow. Since then, she presented multiple episodes of subluxation. A supracondylar subtractive wedge osteotomy of 20° and double plate osteosynthesis was performed with reconstruction of the ulnar lateral collateral ligament. Conclusion: The focus of this article must be on the unusual occurrence of this sequence of conditions. SED is rare in children and generally associated with medial epicondyle fractures. The occurrence of a valgus deformity resulting from an injury to the periosteum can be present and must be taken into account. Posterolateral instability is rare in the context of a valgus elbow. Angular correction osteotomy and ligament reconstruction can be associated with good functional and aesthetic results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.