BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with recurrent World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV malignant glioma is dismal, and there is currently no effective therapy. We conducted a dose-finding and toxicity study in this population of patients, evaluating convection-enhanced, intratumoral delivery of the recombinant nonpathogenic polio–rhinovirus chimera (PVSRIPO). PVSRIPO recognizes the poliovirus receptor CD155, which is widely expressed in neoplastic cells of solid tumors and in major components of the tumor microenvironment. METHODS We enrolled consecutive adult patients who had recurrent supratentorial WHO grade IV malignant glioma, confirmed on histopathological testing, with measurable disease (contrast-enhancing tumor of ≥1 cm and ≤5.5 cm in the greatest dimension). The study evaluated seven doses, ranging between 107 and 1010 50% tissue-culture infectious doses (TCID50), first in a dose-escalation phase and then in a dose-expansion phase. RESULTS From May 2012 through May 2017, a total of 61 patients were enrolled and received a dose of PVSRIPO. Dose level −1 (5.0×107 TCID50) was identified as the phase 2 dose. One dose-limiting toxic effect was observed; a patient in whom dose level 5 (1010 TCID50) was administered had a grade 4 intracranial hemorrhage immediately after the catheter was removed. To mitigate locoregional inflammation of the infused tumor with prolonged glucocorticoid use, dose level 5 was deescalated to reach the phase 2 dose. In the dose-expansion phase, 19% of the patients had a PVSRIPO-related adverse event of grade 3 or higher. Overall survival among the patients who received PVSRIPO reached a plateau of 21% (95% confidence interval, 11 to 33) at 24 months that was sustained at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS Intratumoral infusion of PVSRIPO in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV malignant glioma confirmed the absence of neurovirulent potential. The survival rate among patients who received PVSRIPO immunotherapy was higher at 24 and 36 months than the rate among historical controls.

IMPORTANCE New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. INTERVENTIONS Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. RESULTS Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A.

Nivolumab monotherapy was better tolerated than nivolumab + ipilimumab; the tolerability of the combination was influenced by ipilimumab dose. These safety and exploratory findings merit further investigation of immunotherapies in glioblastoma.

Summary Background Bevacizumab and erlotinib target different tumour growth pathways with little overlap in their toxic-effect profiles. On the basis of promising results from a phase 1/2 trial assessing safety and activity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab for recurrent or refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 3 trial. Methods In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial (BeTa), we enrolled patients with recurrent or refractory NSCLC who presented to 177 study sites in 12 countries after failure of first-line treatment. Patients were randomly allocated in a one-to-one ratio to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (bevacizumab group) or erlotinib plus placebo (control group) according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence by use of an interactive voice response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in all enrolled patients. Patients, study staff, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. We assessed safety by calculation of incidence of adverse events and tissue was collected for biomarker analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00130728. Findings Overall survival did not differ between 317 controls and 319 patients in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·80–1·18, p=0·7583). Median overall survival was 9·3 months (IQR 4·1–21·6) for patients in the bevacizumab group compared with 9·2 months (3·8–20·2) for controls. Progression-free survival seemed to be longer in the bevacizumab group (3·4 months [1·4–8·4]) than in the control group (1·7 months [1·3–4·1]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·52–0·75) and objective response rate suggested some clinical activity of bevacizumab and erlotinib. However, these secondary endpoint differences could not be defined as significant because the study prespecified that the primary endpoint had to be significant before testing of secondary endpoints could be done, to control type I error rate. In the bevacizumab group, 130 (42%) of 313 patients with safety data had a serious adverse event, compared with 114 (36%) controls. There were 20 (6%) grade 5 adverse events, including two arterial thromboembolic events, in the bevacizumab group, and 14 (4%) in the control group. Interpretation Addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib does not improve survival in patients with recurrent or refractory NSCLC. Funding Genentech.

Abstracts iii21NEURO-ONCOLOGY • MAY 2017 characterized, potential paracrine effects influencing antitumor immunity remain enigmatic. However, they are important to decipher, as immunotherapies targeting IDH1-mutant gliomas are emerging. AIM: This study aimed at characterizing a potential cell-specific modulatory role of the oncometabolite R-2-HG in shaping the immune microenvironment of IDH1-mutant gliomas. METHODS AND RESULTS: By means of expression dataset analyses, syngeneic murine tumor models and human glioma tissue, as well as a novel astrocyte-specific IDH1R132H-knock in model, we demonstrate that R-2-HG impairs endogenous and IDH1(R132H)-specific antitumor T cell immunity. This is underlined by functional and transcriptomic analyses of myeloid cells indicating a R-2-HG-driven induction of tolerogenicity and compromised antigen presentation. Metabolomic profiling was complemented by mitochondrial respiration assays, calcium measurements and pathway analyses in primary human and mouse immune cells to delineate key molecular mechanisms by which tumor-derived R-2-HG corrupts the glioma immunoenvironment. The functional relevance of R-2-HG-mediated impairment of antitumor immunity was demonstrated in vivo and potential pharmacological strategies abrogating its effects were assessed. CONCLU-SION: Glioma-derived R-2-HG impairs antitumor immunity by affecting both infiltrating T-cells and the associated myeloid compartment, thus contributing to tumorigenesis and resistance to therapy. Immunotherapeutic strategies against IDH-mutant gliomas may benefit from approaches to prevent excess R-2-HG production or its uptake by immune cells. BACKGROUND: Despite available treatment options for patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), < 5% of pts survive 5 years beyond initial diagnosis, and no single-agent therapy has demonstrated a survival benefit in the second-line setting, including bevacizumab (bev), which is approved for the treatment of recurrent disease. Nivolumab (nivo), a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that inhibits the programmed death 1 receptor, has provided clinical benefit in multiple cancer types. In cohort 2 of the open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 143 study (NCT02017717), the efficacy and safety of nivo was compared with that of bev in pts with GBM experiencing their first recurrence after prior radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: Pts with no prior VEGF therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive nivo 3 mg/kg Q2W or bev 10 mg/kg Q2W until confirmed disease progression; pts were stratified by the presence/absence of measurable disease. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were 12-mo OS rate and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RESULTS: At the time of final analyses (Jan 20, 2017), 369 pts were randomized to the nivo (n = 184) or bev (n = 185) treatment arms; of these pts, 182 received nivo and 165 received bev. At baseline, most pts in the nivo (...