No abstract

Summary• Although sclerophylly is defined by textural properties, its adaptive significance has been debated without a strong base of mechanical data. We measured a wide range of mechanical properties across a diverse range of species and leaf forms, including highly scleromorphic leaves, and compared these with sclerophylly indices to determine the mechanical properties of sclerophylls.• Fracture and flexure tests were used to determine leaf strength, toughness (work to fracture) and flexural stiffness ('structural' properties), and specific strength, specific toughness and Young's modulus of elasticity ('material' properties, i.e. normalized per unit leaf thickness).• Leaves varied considerably in all properties tested, and in the way they combined various 'structural' and 'material' properties. However, on average, highly scleromorphic leaves were stronger, tougher and stiffer than soft leaves. 'Structural' properties correlated more strongly with sclerophylly than 'material' properties, and the ratio of stiffness to strength and toughness increased in sclerophyllous species.• Of the structural properties, strength, toughness and flexural stiffness each made substantial independent contributions to the variation in sclerophylly indices, but the best individual explanators were flexural stiffness and strength, with the best predictive model being a combination of these two properties. This model should now be tested on leaves from contrasting environments.

Leaf biomechanical properties are thought to impose a significant obstacle to herbivores and as such influence patterns of herbivory more than leaf chemistry. However, evidence for the role of structural traits in influencing herbivore food choice and performance has come from correlative studies, whereas the underlying mechanisms have been given little attention. By manipulating the biomechanical properties of a host grass species through a combination of lyophilization and milling, and providing water separately, we were able to compare behavioral, physiological, and developmental responses of the Australian plague locust, Chortoicetes terminifera, to the biomechanical properties of plant food (exemplified by toughness) independently of the food's macronutrient content and the insect's demand for water. Increasing leaf toughness was associated with reduced rates of locust growth and prolonged development, with potential ecological consequences. Poorer performance on the tougher foods was primarily a consequence of a reduced rate of nutrient supply, which occurred as a result of (1) smaller meals being eaten more slowly, (2) slowed gut passage rates, which limited how quickly the next meal could be taken, and (3) reduced efficiency of assimilation of nutrients from food in the gut. In addition, there were deleterious changes in the ratio of protein to carbohydrate assimilated from the gut. Prolonged development time was associated with increased total nutrient demands throughout the extended developmental period. Because these demands could not be met by increased consumption, there was a decreased efficiency of conversion of assimilated nutrients to growth. By disentangling the effects of biomechanical properties from macronutrient and water content we have shown that leaf biomechanical traits can influence chewing herbivores independently of leaf chemical traits.

This paper addresses the question of how close mammalian teeth are to ideal functional forms. An ‘ideal’ form is a morphology predicted to be the best functional shape according to information of the relationships between shape and function. Deviations from an ideal form are likely to indicate the presence of developmental or genetic constraints on form. Model tools were constructed to conform to functional principles from engineering and dental studies. The final model shapes are very similar to several mammalian tooth forms (carnassial teeth and tribosphenic‐like cusps), suggesting that these tooth forms very closely approach ideal functional forms. Further evidence that these tooth forms are close to ideal comes from the conservation over 140 million years, the independent derivation and/or the occurrence over a size range of several orders of magnitude of these basic tooth forms. One of the main functional shapes derived here is the ‘protoconoid’, a fundamental design for double‐bladed tools that fits a large number of functional parameters. This shape occurs in tooth forms such as tribosphenic, dilambdodont and zalambdodont. This study extends our understanding of constraints on tooth shape in terms of geometry (how space influences tooth shape) and function (how teeth divide food). © 2003 The Linnean Society of London. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 78, 173–191.

Numerous authors have attempted to quantify the physical properties of leaves in relation to aspects of leaf ecology, including decomposition, sclerophylly, herbivory, and leaf function and longevity. This paper examines the relative merits of the punch-and-die, tearing and shearing tests for assessing leaf physical properties. We conducted a series of these three mechanical tests on leaves of Solanum laciniatum, and determined the effect of various test parameters on the measurement of fracture properties. For the punch-and-die test, the parameters considered were machine speed, clearance between the punch and the die, edge definition of the punch, and area of the punch. Aspects of the tearing test examined were notch length, end effects, and length-to-width requirements of test strips, and for shearing tests the effects of blade proximity, angle and sharpness were investigated. All the test parameters investigated were found significantly to affect the assessment of leaf-fracture properties. In addition, fracture properties were found to vary significantly within leaves. Some general principles for designing and implementing tests are outlined. This study suggests that while punching and shearing tests are useful means of quantifying leaf fracture properties, the value of the tearing test may be reduced as it is most constrained by the biological nature of the test material.