Classic studies of object-based attention have utilized keypress responses as the main dependent measure. However, people typically make saccades to fixate important objects. Recent work has shown that attention may act differently when deployed covertly versus in advance of a saccade. We further investigated the link between saccades and attention by examining whether object-based effects can be observed for saccades. We adapted the classical double-rectangle cueing paradigm of Egly et al., (1994), and measured both the first saccade latency and keypress reaction time (RT) to a target that appeared at the end of one of the two rectangles. Our results showed that saccade latency exhibited higher sensitivity than RT in detecting effects of attention. We also assessed the generality of the attention effects by testing three types of cues: hybrid (predictive and peripheral), exogenous (non-predictive and peripheral), and endogenous (predictive and central). We found that both RT and saccade latency exhibited effects of both space-based and object-based attentional selection. However, saccade latency showed a more robust attentional modulation than RTs. For the exogenous cue, we observed a spatial inhibition-of-return along with an object-based effect, implying that object-based attention is independent of space-based attention. Overall, our results reveal an oculomotor correlate of object-based attention, suggesting that, in addition to spatial priority, object-level priority also affects saccade planning.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract