No abstract

Echolocating bats rely on precise temporal processing of sound, as echolocation calls may be emitted at rates as high as 150–200 sounds per second in the terminal “buzz” phase that precedes prey capture by insectivorous species. High call repetition rates could introduce forward masking effects that interfere with echo detection; however, echolocating bats may have evolved auditory specializations to prevent repetition suppression of auditory responses and facilitate detection of sounds separated by very brief time intervals. We assessed the time course of post-stimulus recovery of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in two bat species that differ in the temporal characteristics of their sonar behaviors: the insectivorous Eptesicus fuscus, which uses high sonar call rates to capture prey and the frugivorous Carollia perspicillata, which uses lower call rates to forage. We recorded forward-masking ABRs to paired clicks at varied inter-stimulus intervals and measured recovery from prior stimulation as the ratio of response amplitudes and latencies evoked by the second stimulus relative to the first. We observed significant species-specific effects of forward masking on ABR responses in which E. fuscus maintained comparable responses to ISIs less than 4 ms compared to longer post-stimulus response recovery times (>6 ms) in C. perspicillata.

Barn owls experience increasing interaural time differences (ITDs) during development, because their head width more than doubles in the month after hatching. We therefore hypothesized that their ITD detection circuit might be modified by experience. To test this, we raised owls with unilateral ear inserts that delayed and attenuated the acoustic signal, then used the binaural neurophonic to measure ITD representation in the brainstem nucleus laminaris (NL) when they were adult. The ITD circuit is composed of delay line inputs to coincidence detectors, and we predicted that plastic changes would lead to shorter delays in the axons from the manipulated ear, and complementary shifts in ITD representation on the two sides. In owls that received ear inserts around P16, the maps of ITD shifted in the predicted direction, but only on the ipsilateral side, and only in those regions that had not experienced auditory stimulation prior to insertion. The contralateral map did not change. Thus, experience-dependent plasticity of the ITD circuit occurs in NL, and our data suggest that ipsilateral and contralateral delays are independently regulated. Thus, altered auditory input prior to, and during, sensory experience leads to long lasting changes in the representation of ITD.