BackgroundCOVID-19 infections have been shown to be associated with a range of thromboembolic disease.ObjectiveTo describe our endovascular experience in a consecutive series of patients with COVID-19 who presented with large vessel occlusions, and to describe unique findings in this population.MethodsMechanical thrombectomy was performed on five consecutive patients with COVID-19 with large vessel occlusions. A retrospective study of these patients was performed. Patient demographics, laboratory values, mechanical thrombectomy technique, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were reviewed.ResultsFour patients with COVID-19 presented with anterior circulation occlusions and one patient with COVID-19 presented with both anterior and posterior circulation occlusions. All patients had coagulation abnormalities. Mean patient age was 52.8 years. Three patients presented with an intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Two patients presented with an intracranial occlusion and a tandem thrombus in the carotid bulb. One patient presented with an occlusion in both the internal carotid and basilar arteries. Clot fragmentation and distal emboli to a new vascular territory were seen in two of five (40%) patients, and downstream emboli were seen in all five (100%) patients. Patient clinical outcome was generally poor in this series of patients with COVID-19 large vessel occlusion.ConclusionOur series of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated coagulation abnormalities, and compared with our previous experience with mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion, this group of patients were younger, had tandem or multiple territory occlusions, a large clot burden, and a propensity for clot fragmentation. These patients present unique challenges that make successful revascularization difficult.
BackgroundSpetzler-Martin (SM) grade I-II (low-grade) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are often considered safe for microsurgery or radiosurgery. The adjunctive use of preoperative embolization to reduce surgical risk in these AVMs remains controversial.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of combined treatment of grade I-II AVMs with preoperative embolization followed by surgical resection or radiosurgery, and determine the long-term functional outcomes.MethodsWith institutional review board approval, a retrospective analysis was carried out on patients with ruptured and unruptured SM I-II AVMs between 2002 and 2017. Details of the endovascular procedures, including number of arteries supplying the AVM, number of branches embolized, embolic agent(s) used, and complications were studied. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were compared. Functional status using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before and after endovascular and microsurgical treatments was compared.Results258 SM I-II AVMs (36% SM I, 64% SM II) were identified in patients with a mean age of 38 ± 17 years. 48% presented with hemorrhage, 21% with seizure, 16% with headache, 10% with no symptoms, and 5% with clinical deficits. 90 patients (68%) in the unruptured group and 74 patients (59%) in the ruptured group underwent presurgical embolization (p = 0.0013). The mean number of arteries supplying the AVM was 1.44 and 1.41 in the unruptured and ruptured groups, respectively (p = 0.75). The mean number of arteries embolized was 2.51 in the unruptured group and 1.82 in the ruptured group (p = 0.003). n-Butyl cyanoacrylate and Onyx were the two most commonly used embolic agents. Four complications were seen in four patients (4/164 patients embolized): two peri-/postprocedural hemorrhage, one dissection, and one infarct. All patients undergoing surgery had a complete cure on postoperative angiography. Patients were followed up for a mean of 55 months. Good long-term outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2) were seen in 92.5% of patients with unruptured AVMs and 88.0% of those with ruptured AVMs. Permanent neurological morbidity occurred in 1.2%.ConclusionsCurative treatment of SM I-II AVMs can be performed using endovascular embolization with microsurgical resection or radiosurgery in selected cases, with very low morbidity and high cure rates. Compared with other published series, these outcomes suggest that preoperative embolization is a safe and effective adjunct to definitive surgical treatment. Long-term follow-up showed that patients with low-grade AVMs undergoing surgical resection or radiosurgery have good functional outcomes.
Introduction Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established, durable and lifesaving treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure. However, large vessel occlusions (LVOs) remain one of its most devastating embolic complications. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is safe and effective in the management of LVOs in the general population but LVO trials largely excluded patients on mechanical circulatory support and large-scale analyses of outcomes following these interventions in the LVAD population are lacking. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adult patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from 2005-2018. Regression models adjusting for patient demographics, hospital factors, and clinical severity were used to compare outcomes following MT in patients with and without LVAD. Subgroup analyses were also performed in LVAD patients experiencing stroke in the post-operative setting and stroke in the setting of pre-existing devices. Results Of the 1,633,234 AIS hospitalizations identified, 794 occurred in patients with LVADs. 61% were postoperative. Post-stroke in-hospital mortality was higher among patients with LVADs (23.3% vs 7.23%, P<0.001). Among those receiving MT, mortality was also higher in the LVAD population (31.0% vs 14.1%, P=0.009), though this was largely driven by the post-operative LVAD subgroup. In multivariable analysis, only post-operative LVAD patients experienced greater odds of in-hospital death after MT (aOR: 8.66, CI:1.46-51.3); patients with pre-existing LVADs demonstrated no difference in post-MT mortality (aOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.29-3.91) or in odds of discharge home after MT (aOR 0.63, CI: 0.17-2.32) Conclusion Our data suggests MT is not a futile treatment approach in patients with pre-existing LVADs and may result in similar rates of good outcomes. Additional research is needed to evaluate the long-term benefits of endovascular therapy after stroke in patients on LVAD support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.