Background: Restoration of nasal lining is essential in reconstruction of subtotal/total nasal defects. When local flaps are inadequate, a microvascular flap should be used. The purpose of this scoping review is to map the literature and identify the described flap options for subtotal/total nasal reconstruction. Further to that, we will summarize the stated advantages and disadvantages, evaluate functional and esthetic outcomes, and appraise the current body of literature. Methods: An electronic literature search was completed. Studies required adult patients with subtotal/total nasal defects and lining reconstruction with microvascular free flap. Two independent reviewers completed screening and data extraction. Flap characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, functional and esthetic outcomes were reviewed. Two independent reviewers evaluated study quality. Results: Of 305 initial articles, 22 studies were included (13 case reports, 9 case series) accounting for 65 flaps. Microvascular flaps varied by composition and anatomical location. For functional outcome, 13 studies used clinical exam by surgeon, 5 reported patient being satisfied, 3 studies used endoscopy, and 1 study used nasometry. Assessing esthetic outcome, 13 studies used clinical exam by surgeon, 5 studies reported patient being satisfied, 1 study used patientreported outcome measures, and 16 studies included photos. Study quality (modified CARE and PROCESS checklists) was deemed poor. Quality of available evidence was level IV.Conclusions: Microvascular free flaps for nasal reconstruction, confer an overall satisfactory functional and esthetic outcome. All studies lack a systematic and comprehensive approach to assessing and reporting these outcomes. Future research should provide objective assessment and utilize patient reported outcome measures.

Purpose: Surgical site infections (SSI) in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction can have a significant impact on patient outcome. Despite current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines recommending 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics, various perioperative antimicrobial regimens are reported in the literature. Consensus on the optimal duration of antibiotics remains unclear. In this study, the aim is to compare the incidence of surgical site infections following different antibiotic durations in alloplastic breast reconstruction. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients who underwent expander/implant-based breast reconstruction between January 2009 and December 2014 at a tertiary centre were included. Data on patient demographics, risk factors, operative time, choice and timing of antibiotic used before surgery, and the duration of postoperative antibiotic use were collected. The primary outcome, SSI, is defined according to CDC criteria. Results: A total of 507 consecutive expander/implant-based cases were included. Minimum follow-up time was 1 year. The overall infection incidence was 14% (95% CI: 11%-17%), and the rate of subsequent explantation was 8%. Of the infected cases, 80% (45/56) received 1 week of postoperative antibiotic, while 20% (11/56) had a prolonged course of antibiotics (2-3 weeks; P = .003, odds ratio [OR] = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.4-5.8). Most infections were superficial (65%). Prior history of radiation treatment was identified as a risk factor for developing surgical site infection ( P = .02). Conclusion: Overall infection rate and risk factors for infections are in keeping with current literature. Prescribing one week of postoperative antibiotic was found to be associated with a higher incidence of SSI compared to a more prolonged antibiotic regimen.