Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome is a multifaceted condition, which is relatively common after distal radius fracture. Method: A series of audits and service evaluations were conducted from 2004 to 2013 to investigate the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I and any correlation to tight, restrictive, over-flexed casts. Simple subsequent clinical and patient management changes were implemented and impact re-evaluated. Results: These audits have contributed to organisational learning and a subsequent reduction in the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I in non-operatively managed distal radius fracture from 25%, in keeping with expected incidence in the relevant literature, to a rare event (<1%). Conclusion: The authors suggest that careful attention to the prevention of complex regional pain syndrome through staff and patient awareness, vigilance for warning signs and minor modifications to the traditional management of distal radius fractures can significantly reduce the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I after distal radius fracture.

The aims of the study were to quantify the litigation cost of scaphoid mismanagement, identify the main reasons why patients sought compensation and hence provide suggestions for reducing litigation. Data were obtained from the National Health Service Litigation Authority. All orthopaedic-related litigation between 1995 and 2010 in the UK was reviewed. Litigation specifically against mismanagement of scaphoid fractures were identified and grouped according to the plaintiff's complaint. Exclusions were all unsettled claims. There were 85 closed cases of scaphoid fracture mismanagement over 15 years. Reasons for litigation were as follows: seven failures in interpreting radiographs, 57 missed fractures, four fractures not immobilized, nine discharged too early, five delayed operations and three inappropriate surgeries. The mean cost was &OV0556;41 680 per case (range &OV0556;0-&OV0556;206 789), and a cumulative cost of &OV0556;3 542 855. The majority of litigation may relate to a lack of follow-up and may demonstrate a failure of protocol-driven reassessment. Secondary surveys following major trauma are also highly relevant.

Introduction Isolated volar dislocations of the distal radioulnar joint are reported as rare. We observed three such cases over a 12-month period. Literature to date consists of multiple case reports and case series with no structured reviews. There is debate as to incidence, mechanism, investigation, treatment and prognosis. Methods A case series and formal systematic review was performed. This included an analysis of the demographics, mechanism, presentation, investigation, treatment and outcome of the cases identified from the wider published series. Findings In total 99 cases of this injury were identified from 59 papers, with a further 9 cases having an associated ulna styloid fracture. Conclusions This is a rare injury, representing up to 0.02% of all bony injuries, which is diagnosed late in 36% of cases. Inability to obtain a true lateral radiograph may contribute to the diagnosis being missed. Computed tomography scans are useful in suspected cases without radiographic confirmation. Acute cases are successfully treated with closed reduction in 78% of cases; however associated soft tissue injuries may need to be surgically addressed. Delayed presentation is more likely to require open surgery and preoperative MRI scans are indicated to aid surgical planning. Chronic instability rarely occurs and may need treatment with reconstruction or salvage. A good, subjective, result is reported in the majority of patients.