We present three studies that investigate the effect of group-level language ability expectations on language
ability judgements. Study 1 identifies expected English-language ability levels that native English speakers’ have for a number of
non-native English-speaker groups. Based on the results, two text-based written-guise studies were conducted investigating the
level of detriment that grammatical and lexical/typographical errors created on English-language ability ratings for different
author guises (Swedish, Chinese, English) in formal (Study 2) and informal contexts (Study 3). In both contexts, grammatical
errors produced by the guise representing the lower-ability non-L1 group were overlooked, while the same errors produced by the
other guises significantly lowered the ability ratings. Our results coincide with the idea of the ‘sympathetic native speaker’ and
expand it, suggesting that expected language level based on linguistic group membership inversely affects the level of
sympathy/tolerance demonstrated. We link this to possible pedagogical implications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.