If health can be defined as adaptability, then measures of adaptability are crucial. Convergent findings across clinical areas established the notion that fractal properties in bio-behavioural variability characterize the healthy condition of the organism, and its adaptive capacities in general. However, ambiguities remain as to the significance of fractal properties: the literature mainly discriminated between healthy vs. pathological states, thereby loosing perspective on the progression in between, and overlooking the distinction between adaptability and effective adaptations of the organism. Here, we design an experimental tapping paradigm involving gradual feedback deprivation in groups of healthy subjects and one deafferented man as a pathological-limit case. We show that distinct types of fractal properties in sensorimotor behaviour characterize, on the one hand impaired functional ability, and on the other hand internal adaptations for maintaining performance despite the imposed constraints. Findings may prove promising for early detection of internal adaptations preceding symptomatic functional decline.
Background: The acute phase of stroke is accompanied by functional changes and interplay of both hemispheres. However, our understanding of how the time course of upper limb functional motor recovery is related to the progression of brain reorganization in the sensorimotor areas remains limited. This study aimed to assess the time course of hemodynamic patterns of cortical sensorimotor areas using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and motor recovery within three months after a stroke. Method: Eight right-handed first ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke patients (60±8 years, 3 women) with mild to severe hemiparesis were examined with repetitive fNIRS measurements and motor recovery tests (Fugl-Meyer score) during two months. Hemodynamic changes over the ipsilesional and contralesional sensorimotor areas were collected from a multi-channel fNIRS system during intermittent isometric muscle contractions at self-selected submaximal force levels for each arm. Lateralization index was computed to evaluate the changes in the interhemispheric balance between the cortical sensorimotor areas. Results: Lateralization index values during non-paretic arm movements showed no significant changes over time in patients and were comparable to those observed in eight healthy controls. Paretic-arm movements were associated early with a bilateral cortical activity before shifting to ipsilesional patterns ( p < 0.01). Progressive lateralization observed over the two months ( p < 0.05) evolved concomitantly with an increase in the Fugl-Meyer score ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Cortical reorganization monitoring using fNIRS during the first weeks after stroke may be applied for assessing progressive brain plasticity in addition to clinical measures of performance.
Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a promising neuroimaging method for investigating networks of cortical regions over time. We propose a directed effective connectivity method (TPDC) allowing the capture of both time and frequency evolution of the brain's networks using fNIRS data acquired from healthy subjects performing a continuous finger-tapping task. Using this method we show the directed connectivity patterns among cortical motor regions involved in the task and their significant variations in the strength of information flow exchanges. Intra and inter-hemispheric connections during the motor task with their temporal evolution are also provided. Characterisation of the fluctuations in brain connectivity opens up a new way to assess the organisation of the brain to adapt to changing task constraints, or under pathological conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.