IntroductionHaiti has the highest maternal mortality rate in the Western Hemisphere. Facility-based childbirth is promoted as the standard of care for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. We conducted a convergent, mixed methods study to assess barriers and facilitators to facility-based childbirth at Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM) in Mirebalais, Haiti.MethodsWe conducted secondary analyses of a prospective cohort of pregnant women seeking antenatal care at HUM and quantitatively assessed predictors of not having a facility-based childbirth at HUM. We prospectively enrolled 30 pregnant women and interviewed them about their experiences delivering at home or at HUM.ResultsOf 1105 pregnant women seeking antenatal care at the hospital between May and December 2017, 773 (70%) returned to the hospital for facility-based childbirth. In multivariable analyses, living farther from the hospital (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.73; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96), poverty (AOR=0.93; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) and household hunger (AOR=0.45; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.79) were associated with not having a facility-based childbirth. Primigravid women were more likely to have a facility-based childbirth (AOR=1.34, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.76). Qualitative data provided insight into the value women place on traditional birth attendants (‘matrons’) during home-based childbirths. While women perceived facility-based childbirths as better equipped to handle birth complications, barriers such as distance, costs of transportation and supplies, discomfort of facility birthing practices and mistreatment by medical staff resulted in negative perceptions of facility-based childbirths.ConclusionPregnant women in rural Haiti must overcome substantial structural barriers and forfeit valued support from traditional birth attendants when they pursue facility-based childbirths. If traditional birth attendants could be involved in care alongside midwives at facilities, women may be more inclined to deliver there. While complex structural barriers remain, the inclusion of matrons at facilities may increase uptake of facility-based childbirths, and ultimately improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Background/Objective: A patient presenting with an acute neurologic deficit with no apparent etiology presents a diagnostic dilemma. A broad differential diagnosis must be entertained, considering both organic and psychiatric causes.Methods: A case report and thorough literature review of acute paraplegia after a low-energy trauma without a discernible organic etiology.Results: Diagnostic imaging excluded any bony malalignment or fracture and any abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging. When no organic etiology was identified, a multidisciplinary approach using neurology, psychiatry, and physical medicine and rehabilitation services was applied. Neurophysiologic testing confirmed the absence of an organic disorder, and at this juncture, diagnostic efforts focused on identifying any psychiatric disorder to facilitate appropriate treatment for this individual. The final diagnosis was malingering. Conclusions:The full psychiatric differential diagnosis should be considered in the evaluation of any patient with an atypical presentation of paralysis. A thorough clinical examination in combination with the appropriate diagnostic studies can confidently exclude an organic disorder. When considering a psychiatric disorder, the differential diagnosis should include conversion disorder and malingering, although each must remain a diagnosis of exclusion. Maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and involving multiple disciplines (neurology, psychiatry, social work, medical specialists) early in the evaluation of atypical paralysis may facilitate earlier diagnosis and initiation of treatment for the underlying etiology.

in which 20 of 30 patients tested positive of SARS-CoV-2. 6 Neonates and infants with COVID-19 in that cohort had mild symptoms. 6 In addition, the present analysis found that the proportion of concomitant SBIs among young infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar to the proportion of bacterial coinfection with other respiratory viruses before the pandemic.A limitation of this study is that tests were infrequently performed for respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic because reagents were in critical shortage. Also, this was a single-center study at an urban tertiary pediatric ED in a city with a high prevalence of COVID-19.

No abstract

Objectives Correction factors have been proposed for traumatic lumbar punctures (LPs) in febrile young infants. However, no studies have assessed their diagnostic utility. We sought to determine the proportion of traumatic LPs safely reclassified as low risk for bacterial meningitis using recently derived white blood cell (WBC) and protein correction factors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed traumatic LPs among all febrile infants ≤60 days old at two tertiary paediatric hospitals from 2006 through 2018. Traumatic LPs were defined as ≥10,000 RBCs/mm3. Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) WBCs and protein were adjusted downward using a newly derived correction factor (877 red blood cells [RBCs]: 1 WBC), three commonly used correction factors (500 WBCs: 1 RBC; 1,000 WBCs: 1 WBC; peripheral RBCs: WBCs), and a newly derived protein correction factor (1,000 RBCs: 0.011 g/L protein). Results There were 437 traumatic LPs including 357 (82%) with pleocytosis and 4 (0.9%) with bacterial meningitis. Overall, fewer infants were classified as having CSF pleocytosis using 877:1 and 1,000:1 ratios (38% and 43%, respectively), with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value, and improved specificity (63% for 877:1, 58% for 1,000:1 ratios versus 19% for uncorrected counts). Among infants with pleocytosis, 877:1 and 1,000:1 ratios reclassified 191 (54%) and 171 (48%) as normal with no misclassified bacterial meningitis cases. Ratios of 500:1 and peripheral RBC:WBC misclassified 1 infant that had bacterial meningitis. Corrected CSF protein outperformed uncorrected protein in specificity but did not add diagnostic value following WBC-based correction. Conclusions Correction ratios of 877:1 and 1,000:1 safely reclassified half of all febrile infants ≤60 days. These corrections should be considered when interpreting CSF results of traumatic LPs.