BACKGROUND:Recent emphasis has been placed on methods to predict fl uid responsiveness, but the usefulness of using fl uid boluses to increase cardiac index in critically ill patients with ineff ective circulation or oliguria remains unclear.
Objectives/Hypothesis
Both flexible and rigid bronchoscopy can be used to assess tracheomalacia; however, there is limited evidence comparing the two techniques. The objective of this study was to compare flexible and rigid bronchoscopy for evaluating the location and severity of tracheomalacia in children.
Study Design
Retrospective case series.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of children with both flexible and rigid bronchoscopy under the same sedation. All bronchoscopies were reviewed by three bronchoscopists for the location and severity of tracheomalacia. The location of collapse was defined as upper, middle, or lower trachea, and the severity of collapse was defined as none (0%–25% collapse), mild/moderate (26%–75% collapse), and severe (>75% collapse).
Results
Twenty‐one patients were recruited for this study with a variety of neonatal respiratory diseases. There was 94% agreement (κ = 0.64) for assessment of tracheomalacia in the upper trachea. However, agreement was only 75% (κ = 0.50) in the middle trachea and 76% (κ = 0.52) in the lower trachea. In the subset of patients without tracheostomy, agreement improved to 100%, 88%, and 82% for the upper, middle, and lower trachea, respectively. There was poor correlation for tracheomalacia severity in the middle trachea (ρ = 0.30, P = .2) and moderate in the lower trachea (ρ = 0.63, P = .002).
Conclusions
Although there is moderate agreement between flexible and rigid bronchoscopy for evaluating the presence of tracheomalacia, there can be differences in the two techniques, particularly when assessing severity of airway collapse. Future studies will be needed to understand factors that result in the discordance of flexible and rigid bronchoscopy for assessing airway dynamics.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 131:201–204, 2021
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.